JaggedSac said: Halo 3 is ten times better than any CoD. Hell, once Bungie gets their render farms up and running, I will probably never see the light of day again. I put Halo 3 up there with Quake 1/2, Tribes, UT, TF Quake mod(not that Source shite), in terms of shear enjoyment value. And I rocked hard at all of those games.

 

 

You my friend... need shooting. Personal opinion varies though i suppose.

What i dont get about halo is ... how can i shoot someone about 50 times and he lives... then i get hit once with the butt of the gun... and it kills me. (as you may tell in later threads i HATE halo with a passion and aim to express my hate wherever possible) please dont make me go on a halo abuse mission

nice this game is going to rule to bad it has to be released the same time RE5 does
i predict ign gives it a 9.7 - 10

Now all sony needs is a game like GOW yeah they got Uncharted but i need something more dark and gritty like KZ2

So now ps3 has 2 AAA FPS series Resistance & now KZ2 just something to Ponder...

awesome!
It does not matter how many people say they will think the game sucks and they think that ps sites will give it a higher score then normaal.
They will be proved wrong time over time..

the game is better waay better then gears of suck
Just face the facts miclovers.

Holland owns the fps genre.

Carl2291 said: JaggedSac said: Halo 3 is ten times better than any CoD. Hell, once Bungie gets their render farms up and running, I will probably never see the light of day again. I put Halo 3 up there with Quake 1/2, Tribes, UT, TF Quake mod(not that Source shite), in terms of shear enjoyment value. And I rocked hard at all of those games.     You my friend... need shooting. Personal opinion varies though i suppose. What i dont get about halo is ... how can i shoot someone about 50 times and he lives... then i get hit once with the butt of the gun... and it kills me. (as you may tell in later threads i HATE halo with a passion and aim to express my hate wherever possible) please dont make me go on a halo abuse mission

 

I think thats there for the sake of balanced gameplay. I mean...how do rings protect sonic (or shadow) from spikes? Doesn't really work like that no?

Sardauk said: crumas2 said: K2 might turn out to a really great FPS, but if people keep hyping it and the game ends up not being phenomenal, then there will be a lot of disappointment and backpedaling. I would just wait and see how it turns out instead of constantly setting higher and higher expectations. I'm starting to expect scores for this game to eventually reach 11 on a scale of 1-to-10 before the bloody thing is released.   Yep, giving score to a game before the release is bs... but ok if fanboys are happy with that... I read it and this is a ill-written article about a guy who receives a lot of sponsoring from Sony apparently (the website is literally skinned with R2 ads). In "summary" (if you can summarize this ads... euh "review"..) he says : GOW2 sucks, KZ2 rulez...   Time to check your sources guys... cause this ain't a reliable one..

Just cus there is advetising on a website means jack. There is constant 360 advertising on the big sites, so what are you saying. Hell man 1up are even friends with bungie and surprisingly kissed Halo 3's ass. It's everywhere if you look.

The main problem here is the vast majority of 360 owners do not want the PS3 to have a great FPS as it ruins their ideal world. Get over it.

 

Carl2291 said: JaggedSac said: Halo 3 is ten times better than any CoD. Hell, once Bungie gets their render farms up and running, I will probably never see the light of day again. I put Halo 3 up there with Quake 1/2, Tribes, UT, TF Quake mod(not that Source shite), in terms of shear enjoyment value. And I rocked hard at all of those games.     You my friend... need shooting. Personal opinion varies though i suppose. What i dont get about halo is ... how can i shoot someone about 50 times and he lives... then i get hit once with the butt of the gun... and it kills me. (as you may tell in later threads i HATE halo with a passion and aim to express my hate wherever possible) please dont make me go on a halo abuse mission

LOL. Don't run into them. Or better yet, get close enough where they will try for a melee and hold back at the last minute and you will most likely kill him. Melees are not hard to combat. It is a nice balance btween getting close and meleeing, throwing grenades, and shooting. And then throw in vehicles amd there are tons of strategies for any situation and any weapon. It is all about balance which CoD lacks because of perks and in game kill bonuses such as helicopters and such. Everyone should be on an even playing field at all times. And to have been killd with one melee, you would have had to have been hit from behind, in which case you deseve to die for not being aware. iF he hit you in the front, then you would have had to have been hurt a little, in which case you should not have approached the person.

Kantor said:
If anybody in this thread thinks that Halo 3 is better than CoD4, please speak.

I'm not saying it't better, I say I like Halo3 more then CoD4 MW. When I've played CoD I thought I'm in Gaza city or Bagdad. The "war-feelig" was to intensive for me- I was totally stressed.
The war in Halo (not only 3) was fun, I prefer the Halo setting more, thats all.

I doubt it is that good, if the industrie seduce (young) gamers to a attitude to like the real war. But that of topic... I will open a new thread sometime-there is potential for a very interestin debate.

It's nice to read a report like this, I was a PC-only gamer in the past as well. I was pleasantly surprised how well Resistance: Fall of Man played with the PS3 gamepad, it didn't take long for me to adjust to at all.

Can't wait to try Killzone 2, it looks awesome!

@ Disolitude

So let me get this right. The site awards games like Halo 3 a 9.8 and Gears 2 a 9.7 and they are Sony fanboys? Yes, god forbid that they rate a ps3 game a 9.9! Those 9.7's sure do look like 6's now. :P You are just a damn fanboy, and your claiming this site is? For one, they didn't get their review copy early, maybe you stayed out of ps3 threads unless they were targets for your trolling but MM made a thread last month that confirmed that all reviewers recieved review copies for the game (much earlier then most other games to boot). Also, they aren't the first non official PS3 mag/site to review the game. There was another, only it wasn't sanctioned by Metacritic. So what your seeing here is a second site breaking the embargo but because it scored well and is counted by metacritic you start screaming and whining that they are sony fanboys. Furthermore, different reviewers have a difference in opinions. This reviewer is a PC gamer and was voicing his distaste for other console shooters (he didn't review those games). Also, when he stated that K2 made Gears 2 look like a high school outing, he goes on to say what a huge compliment that is. Now, I agree that it is best to wait for bigger reviewers but not for the fanboy reasons as you. I'm sure when this same site gave such increadible reviews to Halo 3 and Gears 2 you didn't say let's wait for other reviews because they are such ps3 fanboys. Your reasons for wanting to wait are childish and immature. Seriously, go enjoy Halo 3 if that's what you enjoy. But if it's so good I don't see how you have so much time to voice such fanboyish comments so frequently.

Solid_Raiden said: @ Disolitude So let me get this right. The site awards games like Halo 3 a 9.8 and Gears 2 a 9.7 and they are Sony fanboys? Yes, god forbid that they rate a ps3 game a 9.9! Those 9.7's sure do look like 6's now. :P You are just a damn fanboy, and your claiming this site is? For one, they didn't get their review copy early, maybe you stayed out of ps3 threads unless they were targets for your trolling but MM made a thread last month that confirmed that all reviewers recieved review copies for the game (much earlier then most other games to boot). Also, they aren't the first non official PS3 mag/site to review the game. There was another, only it wasn't sanctioned by Metacritic. So what your seeing here is a second site breaking the embargo but because it scored well and is counted by metacritic you start screaming and whining that they are sony fanboys. Furthermore, different reviewers have a difference in opinions. This reviewer is a PC gamer and was voicing his distaste for other console shooters (he didn't review those games). Also, when he stated that K2 made Gears 2 look like a high school outing, he goes on to say what a huge compliment that is. Now, I agree that it is best to wait for bigger reviewers but not for the fanboy reasons as you. I'm sure when this same site gave such increadible reviews to Halo 3 and Gears 2 you didn't say let's wait for other reviews because they are such ps3 fanboys. Your reasons for wanting to wait are childish and immature. Seriously, go enjoy Halo 3 if that's what you enjoy. But if it's so good I don't see how you have so much time to voice such fanboyish comments so frequently.

 

I honestly want Killzone 2 to be good. I will play it eventually if its good. But I will not get my hopes up because Middle Eastern Gamer said that the game is the best thing sicne Jesus (or mohamed in this case).

I would have posted nothing if people took this review with a grain of salt like they should have. But all these posts here didn't ask the questions of how they got an early copy? why this site wasn't heard of before? and why they are comparing a 3rd person shooter to a FPS and calling it a high school production.

All everyone was posting is this thread was "PS3 FTW!" and "This game is going to be awesome!"

I'm sorry but this review screams bullshit. Conviniently Halo 3 has a 9.8 and Gears has 9.7 but this has 9.9!!!!! ITs better...by 0.1...yes, PS3 FTW!

Honestly I think all those reviews are BS.

The site says its performing maintenance (if its even real) and I still havent been able to read any of those reviews in the fullest. But people need to stop seeing what they are hoping to see and look at the obvious facts.

Also, if hes a PC biased gamer, how is he to give a fair assesment of a console FPS game?