there's also Battlefield 2 which is still pretty popular and Battlefield 2142, kinda sci-fi (not completely :P), which I would say is fairly popular
however I think if you are low level it's a bit harder than COD4, and you don't level up too easily as in COD4 (at least *I* didn't), as you have to pick a class and really play as that class to improve.
the words above were backed by NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
Leveling up in FPSes really doesnt do it for me, and Vlad has more or less mentioned all the problems i have with it.It makes no sense to award better weapons to player with better skills. What would have made sense was giving the noobs the best weapons to choose from, and stripping down as time went by, till they are left with the very basic weaponry(at a level beyond which everyone should have similar skills).
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murders will foam up about their waist and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"...
....and I'll look down and whisper "no."
- Rorschach
| BringBackChrono said: Leveling up in FPSes really doesnt do it for me, and Vlad has more or less mentioned all the problems i have with it.It makes no sense to award better weapons to player with better skills. What would have made sense was giving the noobs the best weapons to choose from, and stripping down as time went by, till they are left with the very basic weaponry(at a level beyond which everyone should have similar skills). |
That sounds horrible. Stripping weapons from a game as time goes on? So your reward for advancing is playing with the shittiest five weapons and a crappy pistol? I'm pretty sure everyone would be deleting their multiplayer advancement every day or two.
Tag: Became a freaking mod and a complete douche, coincidentally, at the same time.
@Onyxmeth
It was just a statement of logic. I never said people would like it, but its way more logical than powering up players who have already invested enough time and effort on the game to be good at it
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murders will foam up about their waist and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"...
....and I'll look down and whisper "no."
- Rorschach
Onyxmeth said:
Everything. The aiming is all twitchy as is the movement. There isn't a smooth movement as you move the analogs. The aiming must be on some wacky aim assist because it jumps without me moving it. I would chalk it up to lag, but it seems the lag is independent of the gameplay issues. The game basically runs fine for a time and then starts to jump frames. It's really annoying. If you have a PS3, or have access to one, try out the demo and you'll see what I mean. If you don't, then you must be playing with these problems and are a glutton for punishment without realizing it.
|
You might be right with your last sentence - I find the aiming in shooters on consoles so difficult that I probably wouldn't be able to judge weather there are glitches or not (I feel the same way as in your description when I play Halo online lol). I didn't feel there was any aim assist though.
Seems by your description the console versions have serious issues.
Onyxmeth said:
That sounds horrible. Stripping weapons from a game as time goes on? So your reward for advancing is playing with the shittiest five weapons and a crappy pistol? I'm pretty sure everyone would be deleting their multiplayer advancement every day or two.
|
LOL!
Actually I love his idea. Nubs should always be given a handicap.
| BringBackChrono said: Leveling up in FPSes really doesnt do it for me, and Vlad has more or less mentioned all the problems i have with it.It makes no sense to award better weapons to player with better skills. What would have made sense was giving the noobs the best weapons to choose from, and stripping down as time went by, till they are left with the very basic weaponry(at a level beyond which everyone should have similar skills). |
Wow.. I'm guessing you're a Nintendo fan.
^Im a bigger fan of FPSes than of Nintendo.
I personally believe in a level playing field since thats how ive learnt playing FPSes. I remember a match when i was just starting off, i mustve been the marked n00b. One of the guys kept picking up the Quad Damage and "humiliating" me. That frustrated me, true, but it also made me wanna grow up and take my revenge some day. When a n00b gets killed by a player nowadays, he could always say" that guy had better weapons".
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murders will foam up about their waist and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"...
....and I'll look down and whisper "no."
- Rorschach
| thekitchensink said: I believe The Conduit is going to have one. |
God, I hope not.
I'm with the no leveling crowd. I don't think leveling systems have any place in competitive multiplayer games, unless everybody starts at level 1 at the beginning of the match, like in Warcraft 3/DotA.
The experienced player already has a host of advantages over a new player. They know the strengths and weaknesses of weapons, their reflexes are more trained, they know the choke points and ambush spots, they know the location of supplies. With all of these inherent advantages stacking in favour of the veteran, there's no reason to add in more gameplay mechanics to stack things even more heavily against the new player.
A better idea is a class system or some other kind of character customization which doesn't give extra rewards to those who have more play time. This is one of the reasons I haven't picked up World at War.
"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.
yeah killzone 2 will be similar.
also it have a online system in multiplayer mode, with bots.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
