You're somewhat right... Because the controls would then suck (no Wiimote, and no, sixaxis would'nt work) and the graphics would not be acceptable for the system, but that's the POINT.

FYI: NMH was originally planned for X360 until one of Suda's associates reccomended the Wii to him...

probably his kid

 the graphics may pass because of it's style.  I'm thinking more of the lines of the games depth.  It's a pretty shallow game in general.  It may be intensely fun but the games pretty bare bones.

Heh, point is the game is on the Wii and not the HD Twins, because of that it got a 9.0 and game of the month. That's like saying GTA IV would of failed on the Wii so it doesn't desearve what it got for the HD Twins. The logic just went out the window and never looked back.

Heck even multiplatform games like Shaun White recieved much higher scores on the Wii platform than it's HD counter part, does this mean the game should be held accountable to the same short commings as it's HD counterpart? Even though it clearly didn't suffer the same short commings?

Arguing something that isn't there is like arguing that god doesn't or does exist, you can't prove or disprove something that didn't happen or left no fact besides the superficial.

I love it. The scores are high only because it's on the Wii.