Wasn't Nintendo at one point a love hotel company too?
Wasn't Nintendo at one point a love hotel company too?
| irstupid said: Wasn't Nintendo at one point a love hotel company too? |
Yep. No one knows what the hell happened, but now it makes games.
Batman...WTF? said:
Yep. No one knows what the hell happened, but now it makes games. |
No wonder the Wii is so popular with women, they were testing the Wiimote in the hotels way back then, lol.
irstupid said:
No wonder the Wii is so popular with women, they were testing the Wiimote in the hotels way back then, lol. |
Ohohohoho... Clever...
Some companies DON'T like to pay out cash dividends. This usually happens with companies largely owned by rich individuals. When a company pays dividends, the stock holders have to claim this as taxable income. If the company instead just keeps the cash, the stock value goes up, and stockholders do not have to pay income tax on the increased stock value until it is sold. MS is the same way.
Yet, today, America's leaders are reenacting every folly that brought these great powers [Russia, Germany, and Japan] to ruin -- from arrogance and hubris, to assertions of global hegemony, to imperial overstretch, to trumpeting new 'crusades,' to handing out war guarantees to regions and countries where Americans have never fought before. We are piling up the kind of commitments that produced the greatest disasters of the twentieth century.
— Pat Buchanan – A Republic, Not an Empire
JaggedSac said:
Slavery was not the main reason for the Confederacy. It was state's rights.
|
except Slavery was the reason for the pre civil war realignment, that killed the Whig party, created the Republican party and brought about the election of Lincoln under the Republican banner, leading to the seccession, you can't avoid the slavery issue as a root cause of the civil war.
Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!! Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)
You know what Nintendo should do with that money that would give them leagues more franchises, names, and titles than anyone? They should finally up and buy Sega, and reform the company's franchises under a tighter umbrella of quality control.
They should definitly buy Sega.
irstupid said:
Ok, I'm sure they used the state's rights as a more justified reason. But it still mainly came down to they wanted the states to be able to decide on slavery, which is wrong. No Government, state, Nation should be able to make rules/laws that allow any ownership of another person. It is just wrong. |
Of course it is in this day and age, but at the time it was a necessary evil.
For all those who say Nintendo should buy this or that studio or publisher, you do realize that the great majority of mergers and acquisitions fail to deliver the results set for the merger/acquisition? Corporate cultures are often times incompatible, the management may not share the same vision, differences in work and business processes cause loads of problems, and the list goes on. It's a very rare exception that a merger or acquisition delivers 100% of what was expected, and those cases are the ones where the whole deal has been painstakingly planned and all preparation work has been done right, and there is a substantial amount of luck present. Just going out buying companies is a sure fire way to get into heaps of trouble.
It looks like the war chest is full enough for about 5 more generations. Nintendo isn't going anywhere anytime soon, SCE on the other hand... The future isn't so secure.
Tease.