By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sackboy's cute, but who says LBP isn't hardcore?

Exactly what I was saying.

There are no hardcore games, only hardcore gamers.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network
Incandescence said:
Sackboy, cute?

Sackboy is a hideous monstrosity of a video game character. Cute is completely out the question. I'd burn that horrid thing with an orgasmic passion.

AGREED. The only character that comes to mind as being cute is a Pikachu or a Moogle. Mind you, OP, but I also agree with Galaki as they are nothing but voodoo dolls. They don't 'ooze' cuteness, they 'ooze' something horrid.

Being on topic, the game is too complex and cannot be called hardcore. There are a lot of physics glitches in the game, as I remember several people having a hard time trying to get obstacles to stay together, and that there are airy/floating physics where the character cannot drop like a sack of potatos as they are intended to do so.



Incandescence said:
Sackboy, cute?

Sackboy is a hideous monstrosity of a video game character. Cute is completely out the question. I'd burn that horrid thing with an orgasmic passion.

 I KNOW, RIGHT?



Incandescence said:
Sackboy, cute?

Sackboy is a hideous monstrosity of a video game character. Cute is completely out the question. I'd burn that horrid thing with an orgasmic passion.

It depends on how Sackboy is done up actually.  When Sackboy sticks his tongue out, and does V for victory with his fingers, and also is dressed, that can be cute.
Anyhow, if you don't like "cute", how about gong with "mascot-y"?

 

 



You can make it whatever you want, thats what I love about LBP



 

mM
Around the Network

Hardcore

 

 

or casual

 



 

mM

You secretly wanted to play with dolls but never admit it until LBP gives you an excuse. "Hardcore" is just a ruse for cover up.

Admit it, you always wanted to play with dolls.



Who can resist playing with a Raiden sackboy?



 

mM
lestatdark said:
I really don't understand this "hardcore" labeling of games :/ I've been gaming since the Spectrum days, and for a long time hardcore was given to those people who would play games nonstop, all kind of games.
It seems nowadays the significance is only given to a specific type of games that are quite recent, completely shutting off genres that have been around since the beginning of the industry

The definition of hardcore changed with people could bitch and moan on the internet. While I play significantly less games than I used to, I would probably still be called a "hardcore" gamer by most of the people that know me. However, I don't fit into the "modern" definition becuase I actually play a wide variety of games, including many that are consider causal.

In recent years though, with internet forums to come and complain on, those who feel they aren't being personally pandered to by the companies, come and complain and badmouth anyone who plays any games they don't consider "hardcore". Since most of them are in their teens (not that I'm all that much older) their taste in gaming is what they consider "mature" even though most adults wouldn't consider the games mature at all (not that slaughtering an entire army of people isn't fun).

Although I was born shortly after the spectrum was released, I was gaming since a very early age (my mum, who was gaming before the sepectrum and still does to this day, introduced me to gaming), I agree with your definition. It has only been recently with a vocal minority, that the definition has changed.

Sidenote: My Mum, who plays 30-40 hours of games a week, would not be called hardcore because she has never played a "hardcore" game in her life.

 



The definition of hardcore was made by fanboys, I will admit it, this stupid "hardcore" crap was never in hell mentioned in the ps2 era, because there werent many fanboys at all.



 

mM