Haha epic fail. The 'jaggies' your talking about actually happened on the X360 version after the September 6 update and were due to caching issues. The same happened to PC but it can be corrected by the user.

The PS3 version ships with the widescreen option called "horizontal plus" which was introduced via a patch in the 360 version and the cutscene videos are of a much higher resolution than in the DVD version.

Weren't some 360 boys saying this had better graphics then Uncharted?

How come the first game ever where the PS3 version is actually a higher resolution, you try to pretend that "this is the first game where the resolution difference is really "remarkable.""

You sir, are simply biased, and either viewing these images through rose colored glasses, or lying about what you see.

First and foremost, "360 boys" is a passive-agressive insult. You are obviously heavily invested in the childish "console war."

Second, relatively, the graphics between most "next gen" games aren't that different, when considering the vast number of games being released even today.

Finally, no, noone ever said that. Uncharted is a very decent game, with beautiful graphics. If the actual game part was better, it would get the respect you "Sony boys" want it to have. From the opposite camp, I highly doubt anyone would ever bring up Uncharted unless a "Sony boy" brought it up first. I have played it, but I wouldn't exactly cry myself to sleep at night if I had those 8 hours back. However, if your assertion was that the 360 isn't capable of Uncharted's level of graphics, I would scoff. The only game that gen, on a console, that looks better than Gears 2 so far, is Killzone 2 Beta, with the possible exceptions of GranTurismo, and MGS4. Uncharted is arguably comparable, but the again, it's arguably not.

As far as I remember, the only game that has a higher res on X360 than on PS3 game GTA IV (640p). This one runs at 576p.

On both the difference is remarkable, although TRU has some annoying effects (like he said) that GTA IV PS3 hadn't, compared to the X360 version.

I swear someone like stickball made a thread argruing it before it released.

And you assumptions are pretty off, I don't not intend to claim anything about 360 not having PS3's capabilities.

And sorry about the "boys", I just didn't want to say fanboys because people get mad. I kind of blew that, hehe.

The bolded part is completely inaccurate, however, I'm not here to argue with you. Just think what you want. If you care to investigate my accuracy, then feel free.

Off the top of my head, I believe Bioshock, and Soul Calibur 4(and nearly every mutliplat this gen) has a slightly lower native "just scan" resolution on the PS3.

Not that you can tell, depending on the size of your TV.

To be completely honest, I didn't even look at the pictures, or click the link. I know the poster. I'm not ignorant enough to believe him.

It's cool bro, I know the game. ;)

Game Title - Tomb Raider Underworld

Avail System - PS3, 360, Wii

Wii - $29.99, Animations are more mechanical/robotic making it more difficult to control. Camera mapped to D-Pad makes it jittery and hard to control, low-res port of the 360 and PS3 versions, choppy animation, significantly more jaggy, least rewarding of the bunch

PS3 - $49.99, no Trophies, capped at 720p, choppy especially when moving the camera in big environments

360 - $49.99, Achievements, better framerate than PS3, 1080i/1080p upscaled,

Verdict - 1. 360 2. PS3 3. Wii