Well I try to keep it as unbias as possible but even I can be a little stubborn every now and then.  Mainly when it comes to Zelda haha but that's ok. 

I mean I'm just more concerned with what's right than what things are.  I'd question everyday about the fun factor in LBP but I'll defend its innovation til the death because I think the gaming industry needs more things like that.  Which is why it really doesn't matter what the subject is, I'm going to side what I think is right, not necessarily what I want to be right.  I wanted Wii's online to be great, but it's not.  So I'm not going to side with Nintendo on that.  Just how I am I suppose.

Sure they do, just buy a HD console.

Kidding,  the Wii has more than one good game every 5 months.

I think he was saying from a single developer which is probably the truth.  Most large devs, such as Ninty, only release 2-3 big games ever year with no guarantees that all will be hits.

 What was your opinion? You said what you said as a definition, that wasn't an opinion. What I'm saying isn't an opinion either, it's a fact. Somewhere, it was forgotten that an opinion has to build on education, and now some people define an opinion as something that can range from extremely educated to completely clueless. Now people like you think it's ok to have an opinion about something you have no clue about. That's not optimal. Actually, it's pretty dangerous in a democracy.

And thanks for the uber prententious attempt at a knock at the end. Tells people alot about you.

Even Democracies must give up freedoms to achieve order though. In fact when we vote for our president we are voting for the very freedoms we are willing to give up in order to achieve that order. We do this by investigating the policies of the candidates and what we lose vs. what we gain. For instance, by looking at the political parties as a whole, Democrats would rather give up some freedoms for the pursuit of equality while Republicans would have us give up some freedoms for order and protection.

To be free is to live without laws, therefore we limit our freedoms by inacting laws to protect us.

We have to be adults at times, something I sometimes forget when I'm in a forum with teens and children.

If someone says something like "The Wii is a non-portable PSP", try to ignore their ignorance. I'm sure you know it's not true in any shape or form.

@Zucas

Will if thats the case, yea, its real hard for one developer to release lots of strong ip in a year's time.

I dont know why people complain there isnt a zelda(which there is), or a Super mario platformer(which there is) on the wii announced yet? Its obvious its coming, I mean its nintendo, dont let fanboys derail you and say "They dont care about the fans" or any of that bull crap, because its not true, nintendo has always cared about its fanbase.

Its just this gen they are making more games to introduce more people into gaming.

Yes even democracies couldn't avoide the teachings of Hobbes.  Absolute freedom is impossible in a world of chaos.  However, I personally believe chaos can be destroyed by virtue ethics.  It's the law set up by that of Aristotle who's basic principle is that ethical people will make ethical decisions.  From birth ethics and justice should be the prime subjects of learning along with normal education.  Teach them about the "good" as Aristotle would put it and they will be ethical people.  Ethical people can live with absolute freedom devoid of a set of laws because they will do the right thing.  Sure they would have the freedom to kill someone and their would be no repercussions but if they know this is unethical they won't do it. 

Maybe that's just the idealist in me or maybe its a possibility.  Who knows.

here.... just replace Britney with Nintendo and you have the OP in Video Form

LEAVE NINTENDO ALONE.......

lmfao