Game_boy said:
What? Consoles are about as expensive as iPods, and consoles could certainly do with a smoother interface and better online features, as well as better multimedia support. It would work, only with better marketing than the PS3. AMD/Intel: Probably not, although I see where you're coming from because AMD makes CPUs, GPUs and Chipsets. They are also heavily in debt and losing money. I would think it would be considered too risky for either: another Xbox, only with no huge cash reserves and no known big brand amongst the general public. |
Yes consoles are expensive. A apple console would be more expensive (800$?) What does an normal mp3 player cost? They are not so expensive like an iPod. Thats not a problem for me. Apple is a company that makes high price (and high quality) products. Look at the cost of the iPhone. Apple hardware is placed and market as luxury, different, cool, stile. You have to pay much money for that. I don't think it would work in the console market.
AMD: Money is not that big problem. They loose money, but they don't lose it with operational business. They lose it, because they buy and invest.
Intel: Well, as far as i know they don't get a piece of the pie at the moment, am i right. The CPUs and GPUs are coming from AMD (ATI) and IBM, right? If Sony/Microsoft succeed in getting the "Home computer" in the living room, they could have a problem, therefore they could be interested in investing in that market.
For the brandname thing. Don't think a new player has that kind of problem. Microsoft has a problem because it had a BAD name in europe(exept UK) and no games for Japan.
Join up to the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP European League!
Or the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP Australian League!
Or the VGC Mario Kart Wii GP American League!
Or the VGC Halo 3 American League!
Or the VGC Call Of Duty PS3 League!











