By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Ubisoft: Disapointed by Prince of Persia's poor reception

It's basically the same EA speech: "We made an effort, we release a unique good game, bla, bla, poor sales, bla, bla, nobody cares, bla, bla, let's make more Rabbids games".

http://arstechnica.com/journals/thumbs.ars/2008/12/23/ubisoft-expected-more-praise-for-prince-of-persia

 

"For years we've all been reading complaints about sequels and companies churning out carbon copies of proven formulas without focusing on innovation or taking risks," Mattes told IGN. "Fans, developers and critics alike seemed ravenous for new ideas—new IPs; major innovations—advances in this art-tertainment form we all love. We tried to really embrace this challenge on PoP. We set out to keep a few core fundamentals but to re-imagine everything else, discarding some very well entrenched ideas not only about the brand but also about videogames in general."

Mattes goes on to mention games like Mirror's Edge, which also attempted to innovate but received similar mixed reactions. "What surprises me is how little these high-level risks seem to be noticed and appreciated as attempts to shake up the industry and push things forward," he explained. "Perhaps I'm an idealist, but I think perhaps I was expecting a few more virtual pats-on-the-back for our attempts to do something new."

Well it's sad but true.



Around the Network

Is he talking about the sales or the lack of acknowledgement?



--OkeyDokey-- said:
Is he talking about the sales or the lack of acknowledgement?

Lack of acknowledgement; Ben is the one pointing at the price.

 



Hard to shine as a game when there is better games out there like Fallout 3, GOW2,Left 4 Dead, Fable 2, Resistance 2 and Little Big Planet. Dont get me wrong I am sure Prince oF Persia is a good game but its getting lost in the mix next to the aforementioned games.



bucknasty said:
Hard to shine as a game when there is better games out there like Fallout 3, GOW2,Left 4 Dead, Fable 2, Resistance 2 and Little Big Planet. Dont get me wrong I am sure Prince oF Persia is a good game but its getting lost in the mix next to the aforementioned games.

 

Of course, but the fact is that those games often get criticized for being more of the same, albeit highly polished same, and it's obvious those wanting originality don't really know what they want.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

Around the Network

By innovation do they mean make it impossible to die?



~Currently Playing Zelda: Phantom Hourglass, Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank: FTOD, and Resistance: Retribution~

Well that's a fault on the gamers. I've been a man of supporting the unique and the new yet still all people rave about on sites like this is the new Gears of War or Killzone 2. Sure LBP will get some hype but it almost seems forced. But nothing for the really new and bold games. On the Wii, it seems to get more hype but sales most of the time won't back it up until further down the road.

Just a problem in the industry right now. We crave new things but us and the reviewers are hypocrites. The MGS's and Zeldas and Halos will still get reviewed better than an amazing new game. And to a certain extent they should, but shouldn't a hell of a lot of hype be around games like De Blob, Prince of Persia, Dead Space, ect. Of course there never is and we give 10s to games like GTA IV. This then pushes devs to stop taking risks and release more sequels and run of the mill titles. And on PS360 this really happens a lot because risk taking is limited thx to high development costs.

So that's something we as gamers need to start solving and it starts with the people who hype it. Better marketing from within of the developers and mainstream media sites need to stick to their word. Then of course when it releases make a statement and buy it first day.



They don't want originality. They want new IPs based on proven formulas. That way the get quality and the appearance of originality.

That's why Okami is Zelda with a new look and a new mechanic (still an awesome game though), but it's praised as original and fresh when it isn't (like Zero Punctuation acting as though that would breathe new life into Zelda, completely ignoring that Okami sold a fraction of the Zelda games).

That's why Gears 1 was praised as bringing new things to shooters, but 2 was called more of the same.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs

You know what VG are not the same as movies. You don't need to go buy the thing as soon as its released.

Economic pressure is ruining the pace of vg production and profit.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

Gamers: disapointed by Prince of Persia's poor gameplay

:D