It looks like somebody else sent a stream of lightning energy through the ground at the guy right before he was toasted.
Looks cool.
It looks like somebody else sent a stream of lightning energy through the ground at the guy right before he was toasted.
Looks cool.
Gilgamesh said:
Maybe he just wanted to blow up the car next to the bad guy and he just through in a couple more to be sure
|
Watch the full gameplay video. You'll see him miss... a lot.
soulsamurai said: I don't know how to link videos so here. Prototype. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB8uy_Bg8gw |
That looks pretty fun and better than InFamous.
SpartanFX said: last night on Xplay the game looked really really fun.if it reviews over 8.5 i ll buy it |
Dont you use your own judgement? even if a game is rated 5 i'll still try it. its only their opinions.
Kasz216 said: Watch the full gameplay video. You'll see him miss... a lot.
|
How is that necessarily a problem? It could be intended that you need to throw a shit-ton of lightning around because it's not supposed to be all that accurate. Depending on how the energy/regeneration system works, taking more shots could work and one-shot-kills wouldn't.
Taking more shots is certainly more exciting and looks better. Which may also be a reason they posted video of a player taking lots of shots.
Anyway.
Mirson said:
That looks pretty fun and better than InFamous. |
Yeah, but prototype looks phenominal. Thats like comparing Saints Row to GTA. InFamous looks great too, can't wait!
GOTY Contestants this year: Dead Space 2, Dark Souls, Tales of Graces f. Everything else can suck it.
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
How is that necessarily a problem? It could be intended that you need to throw a shit-ton of lightning around because it's not supposed to be all that accurate. Depending on how the energy/regeneration system works, taking more shots could work and one-shot-kills wouldn't. Taking more shots is certainly more exciting and looks better. Which may also be a reason they posted video of a player taking lots of shots. Anyway. |
It would be bad because to be a good guy you need to have "surgical percision." to make sure you don't cause much collateral damage.
It's not him wanting to cause colataral damage either... because you can see him missing multiple times on a roof where there is no damage to cause.
Kasz216 said:
It would be bad because to be a good guy you need to have "surgical percision." to make sure you don't cause much collateral damage. It's not him wanting to cause colataral damage either... because you can see him missing multiple times on a roof where there is no damage to cause.
|
A good superhero may not have surgical precision with his powers. He then needs to either confront enemies away from innocents, or weigh the costs of innocent deaths vs the benefits of nuking a bad guy.