Dark Cloud 2 - 35/40
Rogue Galaxy - 36/40
Dragon Quest VIII - 39/40
Inazuma Eleven - 36/40
Jeanne D'Arc - 33/40 (I believe)
Has any Level-5's game ever scored lower than 30 in Famitsu?
| *~Onna76~* said: That's why I hate online functions in games like these, they always mess up the game somehow... No I'm not really a fan of online gaming, still 7,7,7... and then okay an 8? Did they really have to be so harsh on those scores only because of the online part? They're never harsh on Square Enix games?! Children of Mana, Last Remnant, crap games that got high scores. It doesn't make any sense. Oh well, it will take at least 6 months before we'll get to see the game around here... best is to wait what reviewers around here have to say around the time the game releases in the West. But I slightly fear for the Japanese sales. |
White knight isn't good enough. So it didn't score high enough.
@Rei - has any of them got online? no.
WKC got marked down due to Online communication problem. Man some people are so blind that they cant even read that.
Seriously fanboys are silly. They will pick at anything in order to make it look bad. From what Famitsu said the online is their problem. Other then that the offline is solid like all previous Level 5 games.
We have yet to see any other reviews but i can assure you that WKC if the online communication isnt fix will get marked down everywhere. Cause after all they have to score the whole game including off and online.
| *~Onna76~* said: My most wanted, anticipated game for on the PS3, where I literally bought a PS3 for.. . turns out to be the biggest disappointment. Can it go any worse with this stupid generation?!!! |
Wow that sucks, hopefully the one game I bought a PS3 for (GT5) won't dissapoint, and I'm sure it won't......<prays>
| Rei said: Dark Cloud 2 - 35/40 Rogue Galaxy - 36/40 Dragon Quest VIII - 39/40 Inazuma Eleven - 36/40 Jeanne D'Arc - 33/40 (I believe) Has any Level-5's game ever scored lower than 30 in Famitsu? |
White Knight Chronicles
| *~Onna76~* said: That's why I hate online functions in games like these, they always mess up the game somehow... No I'm not really a fan of online gaming, still 7,7,7... and then okay an 8? Did they really have to be so harsh on those scores only because of the online part? They're never harsh on Square Enix games?! Children of Mana, Last Remnant, crap games that got high scores. It doesn't make any sense. Oh well, it will take at least 6 months before we'll get to see the game around here... best is to wait what reviewers around here have to say around the time the game releases in the West. But I slightly fear for the Japanese sales. |
TLR is far from crap. Try playing a game instead of reading reviews.. maybe check mrstickball's thread about TLR or play it yourself. But wait, you're the girl who thinks SO4 is going to PS3 because of some cover art missing the 360 logo, even though BioShock had "Only of 360" on it and there are multiple people in that thread posting cover art of many of the same games with and without the logo that are exclusive.
Even if TLR/etc was crappy and got higher scores, what's that saying about WKC? Ouch.. next time don't buy system for one new IP that hasn't come out yet, especially when that system lacks in that fields genre. It should be bought for multiple games. Stop whining to us...
Proud Owner of: 
250gig FFXIII SE Xbox 360, 250gig Xbox 360 S, black Wii, 120gig PS3 Slim, soon to be 3DS *___*
Yeah that's why TLR gets an average of 65% because its so "great".
And I whine when I feel like it, you honestly think I'd listen to you? Ha!
PLAYSTATION®3 is the future.....NOW.......B_E_L_I_E_V_E
Supporter of PlayStation and Nintendo
Infamous said:
TLR is far from crap. Try playing a game instead of reading reviews.. maybe check mrstickball's thread about TLR or play it yourself. But wait, you're the girl who thinks SO4 is going to PS3 because of some cover art missing the 360 logo, even though BioShock had "Only of 360" on it and there are multiple people in that thread posting cover art of many of the same games with and without the logo that are exclusive. Even if TLR/etc was crappy and got higher scores, what's that saying about WKC? Ouch.. next time don't buy system for one new IP that hasn't come out yet, especially when that system lacks in that fields genre. It should be bought for multiple games. Stop whining to us...
|
You're right, TLR is far from crap.....it's a major Piece of Shit.
| Oniichan said: @Rei - has any of them got online? no. WKC got marked down due to Online communication problem. Man some people are so blind that they cant even read that. Seriously fanboys are silly. They will pick at anything in order to make it look bad. From what Famitsu said the online is their problem. Other then that the offline is solid like all previous Level 5 games. We have yet to see any other reviews but i can assure you that WKC if the online communication isnt fix will get marked down everywhere. Cause after all they have to score the whole game including off and online. |
Famitsu only scores with full points right? No fractions. If that's the case and each of the 4 reviewers mention its a problem only leads me to believe the game got marked down 4 points because of the communicating part.
@ Max - yeah Famitsu only use full points.
EDIT: You have to admit though a communication problem for an online game is a big down fall so i can see why they would mark it down like that. Imagine if a FPS game didnt have the ability to use voice chat and only keyboard chat. That would make it drop huge points regardless of how good the game actually is.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
