some guy told me to make my own thread so i guess i am now.
before i go any furthur, im gonna fasten my flame vest thing or whatever in the hell you guys call it because everyone is going to think im dumb for saying this or whatever, so we have that. and secondly, i think voting for game of the year is a cool and fun thing to do, but i guess there are just some inherent problems in the whole process. its comparable to how games lose steam in their sales after they get released. would anybody honestly consider the new prince of persia game of the year? out of anything that has come out in the whole fucking year, could prince of persia really be the best thing to come out all year? in the game of the year voting thread, a bunch of people considered games like this and left 4 dead as OVERALL GAME OF THE YEAR. i mean, would these two games be talked about at all if they had come out in march or april? i just hate how things like this factor into the equation of game of the year. its lke saying RAINBOW SIX VEGAS 2 FOR OVERALL GAME OF THE YEAR! i guarantee if rsv2 came out last week, that a shit load of people would be nominating it for overall game of the year.
game of the year voting is bullshit.
Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0











