ckmlb said: A great looking Wii game will look better than a crappy looking 360 or PS3 game.... Why is this debatable? The point is Wii owners should stop trying to think that the Wii will have the best looking games versus the best looking of the other consoles, just realize one machine is weaker than both the others and that's why it's cheaper. The less realistic a game looks on the Wii the more chance it has at competing with other non realistic looking games on the 360 and PS3. This is why Nintendo's games all don't look very realistic. This is why Zelda should have kept the Windwaker look because that will hold better over time versus the pseudo realistic TP look which already looks old now. The reason why Mario can look great even compared to 360/PS3 games? Because it's not trying to be realistic and thus it can stand on its own versus much stronger machines and more graphically powerful games. Can we end this debate once and for all? There is a reason for how much consoles cost you know... |
I don't know which thread you read, but the point that I get from this thread is that some PS3/360 owners can't stand the idea that some people find some Wii games more visually appealing. Pretty much everyone (actually I think it was everyone) in this thread has stated that when it comes to realism the Wii is going to look worse. The point people have been trying to make is that realism is not always "better".
And I should correct you when you say the Wii is weaker, it is graphically weaker for sure but it is subjective which machine is weaker overall. I am pretty sure that is what you meant anyways though.