https://store.nintendo.com/ng3/us/po/browse/productDetailColorSizePicker.jsp?categoryNav=false&navAction=jump&navCount=0&atg.multisite.remap=false&productId=prod610637&categoryId=cat600290

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=16201

go to this thread my friend

Should Pokemon Z be DLC for X and Y owner at a cheaper price?

If Pokemon Z (or X2 and Y2) is going to be like the typical 3^rd version for X and Y, should it just be DLC for X and Y owners? If this were to happen, the game should still be sold in retail or eShop for people who don’t own X and Y. However people that own X/Y should be able to download it as DLC at a cheaper price.

Typically, 3^rd versions of Pokémon games are very similar to the original two versions. While the story and region (to a lesser degree) is new, nothing much changes. The art style is the same with some minor graphical updates and there isn’t any new generation of Pokémon introduced. ORAS didn’t introduce the 7^th generation of Pokemon either, but it did introduce Gen IV and VI Pokemon to Hoenn. It's also a remake of a decade old game on a different system. Pokemon Z is going to be on the same system as X and Y.

And although the story of the 3^rd Pokemon version is new, the story progression is very similar to the original two versions. The order of gyms and towns you go through is almost the same.

So should Pokemon Z be DLC for owners of X and Y at a cheaper price?

Note: If downloaded as DLC, Pokemon Z won’t replace your X and Y game file and function as a stand alone game.