I bet Jerseyboy is crying somewhere.. at least changed his avatar.
Pixel Art can be fun.
I bet Jerseyboy is crying somewhere.. at least changed his avatar.
Pixel Art can be fun.
yah the ps3 is better in this game .. i played both demos and i noticed that the ps3 one looks better .... i said that before.
Interesting, I'll wait before I buy this game. I'll wait until there is more word of mouth reviews. PS3 scores better by 0.1, to me it means there equal if the PS3 version was like an 8.0 then I'd say if outscored it.
| XGamer0611 said: Interesting, I'll wait before I buy this game. I'll wait until there is more word of mouth reviews. PS3 scores better by 0.1, to me it means there equal if the PS3 version was like an 8.0 then I'd say if outscored it. |
Well, I just went to check metacritic and currently it's outscoring it by 2% (if that's any indication to you whatsoever), so it looks as if there is another game (and not one that happens to be released several years after the xbox version >_>) that manages to "outshine" the xbox version a bit. Good for Sony, I guess.
| Aj_habfan said: BREAK OUT THE CHAMPAGNE! |
and the motherfuckin condoms!
At least is not 0.5 as in Fallout 3 Gamespot review.
360 - 9.0
Ps3 - 8.5
hmmm ... IGN AU and IGN UK - both give it the same scores. Gamespot and Eurogamer too.
What I really like about IGN is that they really go into detail with their reviews. And in reagrds to PS3/360 reviews, it really doesn't matter. I've read a plenty of reveiws from IGN of PS3/360 releases, giving both games the same final numerical score. But graphically, sometimes the 360 version is slightly better, sometimes the PS3 version is slightly better, and sometimes there is not any mention at all about the graphical difference. So I reiterate that it really doesn't matter, and it really isn't anything to argue about. Have fun.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
Ronster316 said:
Especially because EA are nutorious for closing down servers the moment a game doesn't have as many people playing it as it used to, and because EA make lots of their games region locked grrrrrrrrrrrrrr Army of two been region locked was CRIMINAL on EA's part And i played 573 online matches on Tiger woods 06 and was heading for the 1000 plays achievement when they decided to close down the online multiplayer on the game If anyone buys tiger woods 06 now they can not get ONE single achievement because all the achievements for 06 are online.
|
Not to mention the fact the 360 version was actually the worst version... Less courses and features for only $10 more!

Pristine20 said:
I'm starting to think the ps3 assasinated one of your family members or something Seriously though, the ps3 has no excuse to look inferior? Why? Because of sony PR? lol. PR says whatever sells. If developers can't figure it out or don't feel like figuring it out then graphics fail regardless of whatever hidden powers may be present or absent. Compare MGS3 on xbox vs ps2. Which one looks better? Do you think the ps2 is more powerful or the devs just neglected the xbox version? |
Based on tech and space, the PS3 is superior dude. The 360 is just cheaper and quicker to develop for. The PS3 takes twice the time and space. The Xbox versions of alot of games looked way better than the PS2 counterparts. This gen is totally different with two powerful systems, but the PS3 has the edge even though its a pain in the ass to develop for it.
P.S.
MGS2 was multiplat...not part 3.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Based on tech and space, the PS3 is superior dude. The 360 is just cheaper and quicker to develop for. The PS3 takes twice the time and space. The Xbox versions of alot of games looked way better than the PS2 counterparts. This gen is totally different with two powerful systems, but the PS3 has the edge even though its a pain in the ass to develop for it. P.S. MGS2 was multiplat...not part 3. |
My apologies on the mgs3 gaffe.
As for system power, I'm not good with specs so I can only judge by what my eyes observe. Even so, this gen many people seem to consider the ps3 and 360 equals than last when it was obvious to even the most die hard fanboy that xbox was more powerful than ps2. Ps2 was a pain in the ass as well but was the lead platform for all it's multiplats due to it's massive userbase which the ps3 can even come close to claiming.
Despite the ease of dveloping for the superior xbox, Konami in this case managed to make a poorer port. What else could explain this aside from Konami simply not wanting to make any effort at all? In the ps3's case where it takes even more effort, what do you expect? Answer: lots of shitty ports. I don't care anyway, I boycott them all. There too many other games to purchase.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler