they gave fable 2 a 9.8.
hell

but the 7 to resistance 2 made it obvious.

Why do you care, OP? Can you tell me?

sweet, if they give PS3 games a lower score, they must be 360 fanboys! because there's no way in hell a nintendo fanboy would give PS3 games lower scores because Nintendo's Wii isn't a competitor to the PS3!!!

Perfect logic.

did you missed the fable 2 98/100 , and all the other multiplatform lower on the ps3.

you know sometimes it helps to read the title

Regardless if Variety hates the PS3, no site is worse than EUROGAMER I think everyone can agree on that.

well.. i think variety reviews in general are stupid... read their review on super mario galaxy.. it is an advertisement for Ratchet and Clank... but i don't claim they are sony fanboys, i claim they simply don't know how to review games

On that note.. it is metacritics fault, not variety.. variety does the right thing.. it is a written review, not numeric, they leave the number up to the person who reads the review.. metacritic has read the review and thought it sounded like a 70.. why aren't you claiming that metacritic is the 360 fanboy site?

And IGN just gave it a 9.5, so relax.  There are two possible reasons you're so worked up about the score:  You're a huge fanboy and you're comparing scores to 360 releases, or you can't decide whether or not to buy the game.  If it's the first one, grow up.  If it's the second one, I think you can go ahead and buy the game.  It's generally getting decent reviews.

dude, you kinda need to STFU.

LBP has an amazing 95% on gamerankings, and R2 has like 90%. Why do you care that ONE site gave them below average?

 this is bl sht .... no its not boring its really fun game and it deserve 90+ .. its fun to collect items and to build stages and fun  to play in other players stages aslo the online multiplayer is awesome .

The funny thing is, that Variety doesn't even give the game a score!