Obama's electoral vote total will be HUGE!!!!
| Ickalanda said: McCain/Palin will win because Obama is a socialist which in marxist theory is the first step from capitalism to communism. He has changed his tax definition of rich down to $120,000 from $250,000 just a few days ago hoping that no one would notice. He is going to turn the United States into a communist nation and finish the work that FDR started. Not only that but he attends a heavily anti-American church and has many anti-American connections. American's will hopefully do the right thing today. |
Do you....have proof about his rich claim? And what significance does it have in the election? Did he change his tax plan or something?
I believe Barack Obama will win. However, the votes between him and McCain will be very close. This will be a very close and difficult election. Everyone get out and vote. Let your voice BE HEARD!
TO GOD BE THE GLORY
Jandre002 said:
Do you....have proof about his rich claim? And what significance does it have in the election? Did he change his tax plan or something? |
Bill Richardson misspoke in one television interview last week and said 120k instead of 250k .
Conservatives started shouting: "See, Obama changed his rich definition and wants to raise everyone's taxes."
| Ickalanda said: McCain/Palin will win because Obama is a socialist which in marxist theory is the first step from capitalism to communism. He has changed his tax definition of rich down to $120,000 from $250,000 just a few days ago hoping that no one would notice. He is going to turn the United States into a communist nation and finish the work that FDR started. Not only that but he attends a heavily anti-American church and has many anti-American connections. American's will hopefully do the right thing today. |
Socialism does not make a country communist, nor does in neccesarily start the ball rolling. It is a stepping ston on the way, agreed. But I could name plenty of countries who have been ran by socialists, but never became communist.
I have nothing against conservative posters on this forum, but they make it a habit to spew every cliche possible in the shortest amount of time and space. It doesn't help their image or their message.
Obama. If he doesn't Im not going to school tommorow.
@ Montana: QFT. Its fine if you are conservative, but ridiculous claims are ridiculous claims whatever side you are on. Its not so bad if they are done in a comical way, but no one benefits when they are done out of hate or spite.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
I think it's funny that all of Obama's connection to radical's is through the University of Chicago-Illinois. I mean, anyone who's gone to a big University in any metropolitan area has seen how, let's say unconventional, many professors beliefs are. I mean I imagine as a whole most professors in the liberal arts are neo-liberal. I don't know why this is, I doubt it's a conspiracy but I've noticed that time and again, plus Obama's and usually democratic candidates receive around 2/3 support of PhD holders and postdocs.
The funny thing about the Khalidi thing is that no one ever asks why we support Israel. I believe the shift happened during the Reagan administration (maybe carter I could be wrong) but I know that prior to that we supported the Arab world (particularly the Saudis).
Anywho. Just a rant. I doubt this country will veer too far left. For one thing if it does, Obama would be voted out in four years, and he is too smart of a politician to do that.
Edit: I think Obama will win. I think he will win in "landslide" (well the biggest win in 12 years, not a reagan landslide) fashion on Electoral Votes, around 340 but the popular vote will be much closer I guess around 2 points, not 5-6 like most are saying.
| jv103 said: I think it's funny that all of Obama's connection to radical's is through the University of Chicago-Illinois. I mean, anyone who's gone to a big University in any metropolitan area has seen how, let's say unconventional, many professors beliefs are. I mean I imagine as a whole most professors in the liberal arts are neo-liberal. I don't know why this is, I doubt it's a conspiracy but I've noticed that time and again, plus Obama's and usually democratic candidates receive around 2/3 support of PhD holders and postdocs. Edit: I think Obama will win. I think he will win in "landslide" (well the biggest win in 12 years, not a reagan landslide) fashion on Electoral Votes, around 340 but the popular vote will be much closer I guess around 2 points, not 5-6 like most are saying.
|
This is why I often say that the attacks are linked to the anti-intellectualism espoused by many members of the GOP.
We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls. The only thing that really worried me was the ether. There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke
It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...." Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
