| Glacius said: PC version of Fallout 3 is expected to be the best. I would say not much difference between PS3 and X360 console version. |
This.
Especially when mod tools are released.
| Glacius said: PC version of Fallout 3 is expected to be the best. I would say not much difference between PS3 and X360 console version. |
No one here is saying there is a difference between the PS3 and the Xbox 360 version, besides the Xbox 360 having achievements, custom soundtracks, and exclusive downloadable content.
The opinion of the graphics and framerate on the PS3 version being noticably worse comes from Playstation Magazine.
Welcome to the forums, btw.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
ZenfoldorVGI said:
No one here is saying there is a difference between the PS3 and the Xbox 360 version, besides the Xbox 360 having achievements, custom soundtracks, and exclusive downloadable content. The opinion of the graphics and framerate on the PS3 version being noticably worse comes from Playstation Magazine. Welcome to the forums, btw. |
Achievements? Fair enough. It is a bit of a downer that PS3 owners won't have trophy support.
Custom soundtracks? Given most gamer's taste in music, this is a bad thing. Really though, listening to my own music whilst playing a game that will likely have a decent score screams immersion killer.
Exclusive DLC? How was that GTAIV DLC, btw? Honestly, unless that exclusive DLC will be ready at launch (or near), this isn't a really big plus. Besides, when the GOTY versions start rolling out, both versions will be the same. And if the game isn't good enough to garner such accolades, well then, who cares about DLC?
I'm getting it on the PC anyway, because I think Bethesda may pull an Oblivion again. In which case its going to need some fairly heavy modding to get rid of all the useless dumbing down that will make it worse than it actually needs to be.
What's sad is that they used this developer during E3 to show the power of TEH CELL, and they were going like omg the cell is so awesome you can throw anything at it blah blah blah, and now the PS3 has the inferior version, that's just pathetic on so many levels.
Jordahn said:
First of all, no one said you cannot use Eurogamer, and no one said it wasn't a reputable source. Second, you said... "It also win both Bonus Rounds - The Orange Box and GTA IV." In regards to GTA IV, IGN wrote: "Past GTA titles have had mild-to-serious framerate issues and technical glitches, because the games were trying to do far more than the PlayStation 2 could handle. While GTA IV is pushing the PS3 and 360 to the limit, it also runs amazingly well. Sure, there are framerate hitches here and there and (particularly on 360) there is some texture pop-in, but it actually runs better than I expected. That a game with great AI, an awesome physics engine and a detailed open world runs so well and with such short load times is a technical marvel. For that, I can forgive framerate issues and some noticeable aliasing." ...and... "For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud." http://ps3.ign.com/articles/869/869541p5.html But maybe you think IGN isn't reputable because the review does not favor your console of choice. See, that's cherry picking. Out of the whole bunch, you only pick what appeals to you because IGN gave the graphical nod to the PS3 version of GTA IV. So in your mind as long as the website/source favors the 360 version of a game over the PS3 version, it's reputable and honest as you said... "At least PSM is being honest (9/10 for Fallout 3 PS3 version)." Again, you CANNOT successfully refute my statment... "But why Eurogamer or any other specific source? Take Assassin's Creed for instance. If you read a variety of reviews for both platforms, some say the PS3 version was graphically better while others said the 360 was better. The same went for GTAIV. What do you do about it? Don't make it an issue because it's not. Unless it's some covert way of bashing the competition by cherry picking what favors your console preference..." Fanboys cherry pick to paint a false picture to hide behind. You have proven that. |
I accept IGN review, even if it is just a review and not a graphics comparison article as 3 I gave to you. Even with the "PS3 has better anti-aliasing" (no AA for PS3 version, 2xAA for 360 version). Still 1:3, I'm waithing for 2 more.
Jordahn said:
Wrong again. He said... "Last gen the PS was the dominant platform..." with "dominant platform" being the key phrase, and he also said "this is the advantage you get for having a bigger user base." The PS2 was dominant because "of it's relatively large userbase and extensive lead" which is what I fleshed out. That's without guessing what he meant by using the his own words in context so it wasn't about graphics. NOWHERE in his paragraph did he say that. You failed again because of your biased fanboyism against the PS3 and reasoning. Your faulty reasoning really invalidated your point that "Now guest which console is not more graphicaly powerfull then 360?" because in a previous post in this thread in regards to GTA IV, I have proven you wrong. |
All of his statement is to explain why 360 version is a bit better! How all of us understand this and only you is still digging?
Hes explanation is that games are developed for the PC+360 and then are ported to the PS - "Its pretty simple the 360 and PC hold the same architecture since the biggest platform for this game is the PC and 360, they developed the game for the PC+360 and are porting it over to the PS3. The issue with ports is you are taking the weakness of the 360+pc version and adding the PS3 which inherently makes it worse."
Then he explain why developers are doing it - "This is going to be a common theme with most muti plat games because the PC/360 market is going to be bigger than the PS3 for the next couple of years."
My statement is - even that original xbox use a lot of PS2 ports - later port or same day ports, games still looks better on it. Then I explain why! Cos XBOX was much more powerfull machine. Then why PS3 ports are worst, even after most of PS3 owners clame that PS3 is more powerfull then 360? Cos it is just not! In graphical deparment it is equal at max. Of course this is mine opinion.
What here is not clear ?!
Jordahn said:
Maybe some gamers don't care much for a post-apocalyptic environment.
|
Some gamers yes, but how all of a sudden all PS3 users stop care about Fallout 3. Check Fallout threads a few weeks ago. I see a lot "day one purchase" posts from PS3 owners. There are fanboys that now might not buy this game because they think they are getting a gimped version. This is pity!
Same happen with FF 13. A lot of posts "FF 13 >>> all 360 RPG games" before E3. After E3 threads like "I think FF versus 13 > FF 13" start poping like mуshrooms after rain.
And by the way. I'm not a 360 fanboy. I'm a gammer and PC is my favourite platform.
BrayanA said:
Some gamers yes, but how all of a sudden all PS3 users stop care about Fallout 3. Check Fallout threads a few weeks ago. I see a lot "day one purchase" posts from PS3 owners. There are fanboys that now might not buy this game because they think they are getting a gimped version. This is pity! Same happen with FF 13. A lot of posts "FF 13 >>> all 360 RPG games" before E3. After E3 threads like "I think FF versus 13 > FF 13" start poping like mуshrooms after rain. And by the way. I'm not a 360 fanboy. I'm a gammer and PC is my favourite platform.
|
^^^Serious generalization. If you said "PS3 fanboys" that would be more understandable. And I'm not asking you to point out specific users, but to say "all," you're pushing false generalizations to push a false point. This is a sign of fanboyism no matter how you try to justify it.
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
BrayanA said:
All of his statement is to explain why 360 version is a bit better! How all of us understand this and only you is still digging? |
Digging??? You're a hypocrite. All I did was used a user's post within this thread while you were the one who had to go out of this website to "prove" a previous "point." Now, I don't think you were digging, but to say I was when you went even further is hypocricy. Hypocricy is also a sign of fanboyism. Keep it up...
Hackers are poor nerds who don't wash.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
