Remember when I did some editing?

You said, "What are you talking about?"

I just wanted to know what you "meant."

Becasue they don't need too much money to develop on the Wii. To develop for the hd consoles they require more money and if it doesen't sell good then small developers will have a harder time. For the Wii they have lesser risks and they can do whatever they want. With all their innovation and what not.

Developing big succesful HD game costs ridicilous sums of money, therefore smaller (yet ambitious) studios will concentrate to bring their games into the Wii. SUDA 51 being a great example, even when NMH was only a moderate success they still made a healthy profit.

I think that many of these developers have (probably) pitched game ideas like these to publishers before but, at the time, they were determined to be too risky. This generation, the high development costs on the HD consoles compared to releasing similar games for the Wii, has changed how people see the risk of games like these.

In order to explain what I mean, producing a game like The Conduit or De Blob for the Wii (probably) costs about the same as producing a Sponge-Bob game for the HD consoles; even if you sell the same number of copies for each game, being that the Sponge-Bob game would have IP licencing and you (might) develop a valueable IP with De Blob or The Conduit, it makes more sense to put money towards the Wii games.

Why the hell are you making this more complicated, could please say if you were talking about the PS2 games or the Wii games and finish this stupid and useless discussion?