By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Molyneux asking for special review consideration ...

starcraft said:
everdom said:
i intereperated what he said differently...

i think he wants a casual gamer to play it so people can see how different the WORLD in the game becomes, as in hes saying that the mentality of the game reviewer will mean that theyll only unlock a certain part of whats possible in the world???

welll thats just what i thought!

This.

 

Does that make the game more fun for the reviewer?



This is invisible text!

Around the Network

What!?!!! no online co-op at launch!!!

Because of it's failure to ship with this very important gameplay feature, Fable 2 deserves to be critically panned across the board.

An averge metacritic rating of 11 into the red "extreme dislike or disgust" category seems fair.



 

Dallinor said:
What!?!!! no online co-op at launch!!!

Because of it's failure to ship with this very important gameplay feature, Fable 2 deserves to be critically panned across the board.

An averge metacritic rating of 11 into the red "extreme dislike or disgust" category seems fair.

I recognise you are being sarcastic.

But I thought I would point out the title now WILL have co-op at launch.

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Killergran said:
starcraft said:
everdom said:
i intereperated what he said differently...

i think he wants a casual gamer to play it so people can see how different the WORLD in the game becomes, as in hes saying that the mentality of the game reviewer will mean that theyll only unlock a certain part of whats possible in the world???

welll thats just what i thought!

This.

Does that make the game more fun for the reviewer?


no, but its not exactly fair to base a game on only half its possible content, especially a game like this!



everdom said:
Killergran said:
starcraft said:
everdom said:
i intereperated what he said differently...

i think he wants a casual gamer to play it so people can see how different the WORLD in the game becomes, as in hes saying that the mentality of the game reviewer will mean that theyll only unlock a certain part of whats possible in the world???

welll thats just what i thought!

This.

 

Does that make the game more fun for the reviewer?


no, but its not exactly fair to base a game on only half its possible content, especially a game like this!

Actually, I think that's totally wrong. You don't base the review on potential, or what other people might or might not experience. It's subjective. That's the entire point of a review, telling others about what you experienced.

GAH! It's difficult, and a gray-zone. I think it's wrong, but that's just my opinion.

 



This is invisible text!

Around the Network
Killergran said:
everdom said:
Killergran said:
starcraft said:
everdom said:
i intereperated what he said differently...

i think he wants a casual gamer to play it so people can see how different the WORLD in the game becomes, as in hes saying that the mentality of the game reviewer will mean that theyll only unlock a certain part of whats possible in the world???

welll thats just what i thought!

This.

Does that make the game more fun for the reviewer?


no, but its not exactly fair to base a game on only half its possible content, especially a game like this!

Actually, I think that's totally wrong. You don't base the review on potential, or what other people might or might not experience. It's subjective. That's the entire point of a review, telling others about what you experienced.

GAH! It's difficult, and a gray-zone. I think it's wrong, but that's just my opinion.


see im the total opposite... im kinda seeing it like someone who never plays games online reviewing a game like starcraft based on its single player.. really i dont think its that outlandish of a request that all the possibilities in the game are shown off..