akuma587 said:
The whole association game is pretty stupid in the first place. McCain had ties with Jack Abramoff, do I really give a shit, NO! McCain even suppressed some of their correspondence during the Senate investigations and had a fairly longstanding relationship with the guy.
Was that connection as questionable or more questionable than any of Obama's connections? Maybe. Should I decide who I am going to vote for on this issue? NO, I know that I know some pretty scummy people and have even been close friends with scummy people. Its these tenuous connections that people on both sides blow out of proportion.
I bet all of us have known someone pretty closely who has committed some major crimes. Hell, my grandma is a huge drug addict. Does that make us bad people? NO. And it is stupid to think that it would.
|
Pointing to things McCain did is merely a deflection of the issue, we can discuss that in another thread, but for now lets stay on topic.
Now, this isn't merely an association as you state, this is participation in the furthering of a radical agenda. Ayers has stated that his radical efforts of the 60s have evolved and he now attempts to advance his agenda through the education system. I repeat, Ayers admits that he furthers his agenda by influencing the education system. The CAC (the organization Obama ran from its inception) was an organization founded and built by Ayers and built on the principle of funding education reform in the Chicago school system. That should ring some alarm bells for any intellectually honest individual, liberal or not.
Now, the documents from the CAC show the foundation was set up so that schools didn't get money directly, instead they had to partner with other groups who were given the money. Groups whose main goals were math/science were refused funding but groups like ACORN were given money along with other community organizing groups many of which had no experience in the educational system of any kind. This is again is extremely consistent with the M.O. of Ayers and is documented fact as the majority of these proposals are still available in the CAC documentation.
Now even if we want to throw out the Ayers connection entirely and ignore the strong indications that Obama was controlling the flow of money into radical projects we still have a problem. Even if we ignore Ayers completely the CAC's goal was supposedly to help Chicago School's improve. Unfortunately, for reasons that should be obvious based on the last paragraph, the effort failed miserably with Obama at its head. And that conclusion comes from the CAC's own investigation into their impact. Again this is well documented by the CAC files stored in the Daley Library at UIC and it should be thoroughly investigated & reported by the mainstream media. The fact that the media seems uninterested in covering Obama's only executive experience should bother people.
I'm sure you're correct that everyone has at one point known some bad people, but I'm equally sure that the majority of us don't enter a close working relationship with that person over the course of a decade...let alone endorse their anti-american books during discussion panels setup by our wives.