Cruisin' wasnt a clean port at all, but I wouldn't asy it was the worst. Did it really seem that bad to you all?

Yeah the "cookie cutter" clip-art style wasn't the most conventional at the time but still, I think if you looked at Body Harvest and compared it, Cruisin USA looked better. The only real problem had to do with Chicago, there were lag issues there, but for the most part it worked. Cruisin' World was a much cleaner package but still, I don't recall USA as bieng that bad, particularilly when compared to it's coin-op counter part. Like I said the Coin-op was nicer, but since this was a port, I would take that into consideration.

I forgot about Clay fighter.

IGN rated Cruisin USA at 4 in graphics. They rated Carmageddon at about 1.

I think there are about a dozen or so games that IGN rates lower in graphics.

For those who care for IGN.

Banjo tooie looks like a ps2 game.

Cruisin USA had great graphics. It's one of the first N64 games I played (and the first I owned) and I thought it looked gorgeous. Don't forget that it's a launch title and we were used to the first 3d games on Staturn and Playstation.

Ocarina of Time looks good. It looks much better than Super Mario 64.

The worst must be Superman 64. This game is an insult to gamers everywhere.

I think Zelda MM looks best on the n64 and for the worst Quest 64.

Some others not yet mentioned that should be well rated graphically.

Resident Evil 2
Forsaken
World Driver Championship
Rayman 2
Star Wars Episode 1: Pod Racer

Most of Rares games were the best looking.. And Zeldas looked good

Rare was great back then.
Killer instinct gold had killer graphX

I really hope you don't mean to say Jet Lag had poor gameplay. That game was teh epics.

Conker was awful in just about every way