By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Who thinks Tri-Ace is in Level 5 league

SHMUPGurus said:
The Anarchyz said:
@SHMUPGurus

How 'bout Dark Cloud series, Jeanne D' Arc, Dragon Quest VIII, Inazuma Eleven or Professor Layton series???

Dark Cloud, never played it. Jeanne D'Arc, don't have a PSP. Dragon Quest, never go into the series. Professor Layton, meh.

Sure, I can understand why people who have played every single game from Level 5 can claim it is a better developer (these look definitely like fine games), but let's not forget that Star Ocean is also a very old series that deserves to be among the best JRPGs ever created. The first game was damn fine, and 'Till the End of Time as well!

 

Yeah, the Star Ocean series is pretty sweet, i like Tri-Ace (despite Infinite Undiscovery), they're good, i just wanted to know why did you put only one of their games, now i know...



Around the Network
SHMUPGurus said:
Splenda14 said:
SHMUPGurus said:
Jo21 said:
Soriku said:
Star Ocean isn't AAA? ROFL.

Fail.

 

no it isn't.

the first 2 were good.

3 had a great battle system but that about it.

The story in 3 was amazing until that part where you had to stay in a sucky medieval planet with a shitty war. Then it re-gets interesting! =p

I really liked that idea of ''you can't interfere in other civilization if they are not the same league as you'' thingy or something like that. It was creative, and they should have built on that idea more.

the whole ending confused the hell out of me in Star Ocean 3 but I still think it was a good game and i am one of the few people that liked Radiata Stories but when I played Infinte Undiscovery I was dissopointed not because it was a bad game but because it was not Tri Ace

 

Ah yeah, the typical JRPG cliché. Most of them end in a pretty freaky way if you ask me. That's what I like about them though! For example, I remember when I was at the very last area in Tales of Symphonia and learned about everything right at the end, the culminating point is always a satisfying moment in RPG! =P

I think Tri-Ace games have better stories then Levle 5 I really liked Infinite Undiscovery story

 



I think the the original poster needs to clarify what they mean by AAA title. I have always had an above ninety percent average score as a qualifier for said status. According to Metacritic Level 5 has no such game. So if nothing else the proclamation has no universal merit. You may use another compiler, or perhaps cite a specific source. However that makes any statement to this effect null and void.

For something to be held as being generally true it should be something all can agree on, and while you may like a Dark Cloud many reviewers were far less impressed then you were. While in the opposite fashion a number of reviewers felt previous games in the Star Ocean series with worthy of AAA status.

Before making factual statements it becomes you to fact check yourself in advance. Use more then one source, and provide needed links. Otherwise what you say has no meaning. More importantly you look less then credible. Nobody argues that you cannot have a bias, but you should damn well make at least a cursory effort to be somewhat prepared. Otherwise you look to be a loud mouthed schnuk.



Torillian said:
if you have any better way to argue over who's opinion is better than go for it, Valkyria. Review averages are the only thing even close to being values we can compare to talk about the quality of games. Otherwise we all just have to give up and admit that noone's opinion is better than anyone else and everyone has their favorite series.

But thats just it. When it comes to something like games/music/movies you cant compare them. It all matter opinions. Technology is something that can be compared not something thats based on pure opinion like video games.

 



My vote goes to Level-5. Don't get me wrong, I think Tri-Ace is great. SO3 was a great game, IU looks fun, and SO4 is looking fantastic. But to be honest, I think Tri-Ace puts way too much in their games. Despite enjoying SO3, I have to admit that I was lost for half the game with all the mechanics in it. I'd probably get it spot on the second time around, but even I haven't found much reason to play it again. I love Level-5; it's simple and at the same time an enjoyable adventure to play their games. My only issue is story-telling, but I get around it eventually.



Currently playing: Marvel vs. Capcom 3, League of Legends

Around the Network

Level 5 because of Professor Layton.

I think both companies are great though, Tri-ace will never, I repeat NEVER make a AAA game, not because their games suck but because of the nature of their games means they are stuck in niche markets that won't reach wide-ranging critical acclaim like say a Final Fantasy would.



ClaudeLv250 said:
Where did this come from? Is this because tri-Ace had the audacity to make 360 games whereas every Sony fanboy and their mother has been hyping WKC despite its inevitable bombing like the majority of Level 5 games?

Level 5 wishes it was on tri-Ace's level. The only established franchises Level 5 have had since conception are Dragon Quest (which they don't own and could be removed from entirely by DQX) and Professor Layton to a lesser extent. Dark Cloud bombed, Rogue Galaxy had modest sales but was fairly forgettable since Level 5 wanted it to be their equivalent to Final Fantasy, and Inazuma Eleven remains to be seen. So far, Level 5's best can barely challenge tri-Ace's worst, but it's not really fair when you've got an older and better developer like tri-Ace and randomly match them up against a developer still struggling to find a place and some relevance in the amrket like Level 5, just because some Sony fanboys a feeling a bit insecure about a game they had no business hyping to astronomical levels in the first place based on past history.

 

Rogue Galaxy was supposed to be their answer to Final Fantasy?  I don't remember that.

And during their Dark Cloud days, they were completely unknown to the gaming world, and their games recieved very little marketing (the first recieved some, as it was one of the first RPGs on the ps2, but not much.  It did manage to go Greatest Hits, though), so you can't really blame for their lack of commercial success at the time.  As for Rogue Galaxy is their worst game (imo, though it seems many share that opinion) AND they were still pretty unknown at the time, so it's a wonder it sold as well as it did.

After DQVIII and Prof. Layton, I think Level 5 is beginning to gain a little notoriety, however, particularly in Japan.



makingmusic476 said:
ClaudeLv250 said:
Where did this come from? Is this because tri-Ace had the audacity to make 360 games whereas every Sony fanboy and their mother has been hyping WKC despite its inevitable bombing like the majority of Level 5 games?

Level 5 wishes it was on tri-Ace's level. The only established franchises Level 5 have had since conception are Dragon Quest (which they don't own and could be removed from entirely by DQX) and Professor Layton to a lesser extent. Dark Cloud bombed, Rogue Galaxy had modest sales but was fairly forgettable since Level 5 wanted it to be their equivalent to Final Fantasy, and Inazuma Eleven remains to be seen. So far, Level 5's best can barely challenge tri-Ace's worst, but it's not really fair when you've got an older and better developer like tri-Ace and randomly match them up against a developer still struggling to find a place and some relevance in the amrket like Level 5, just because some Sony fanboys a feeling a bit insecure about a game they had no business hyping to astronomical levels in the first place based on past history.

 

Rogue Galaxy was supposed to be their answer to Final Fantasy?  I don't remember that.

And during their Dark Cloud days, they were completely unknown to the gaming world, and their games recieved very little marketing (the first recieved some, as it was one of the first RPGs on the ps2, but not much.  It did manage to go Greatest Hits, though), so you can't really blame for their lack of commercial success at the time.  As for Rogue Galaxy is their worst game (imo, though it seems many share that opinion) AND they were still pretty unknown at the time, so it's a wonder it sold as well as it did.

After DQVIII and Prof. Layton, I think Level 5 is beginning to gain a little notoriety, however, particularly in Japan.

I remember it well, I followed Rogue Galaxy heavily after it was announced. They wanted to make multiple installments like FF. This was going to be their own takeoff franchise, but they'd only do it if the first game sold enough. It's been a few years and we haven't heard anything about a sequel, so I'm guessing it didn't reach their sales expectations. It goes without saying that I was a little disappointed with the final game they delivered, so it doesn't really surprise me.

They may have been unknown at the time, but Dark Cloud set up an eerie pattern of repitition when it comes to sales (and flaws) of their game.

And I'm not sure if I'd refer to their Layton/DQ work as 'notoriety.' No developer works on a DQ game more than 3 times; Level 5's time is possibly up after IX. And Layton is their most successful original IP and it's not even an RPG...it just goes back to what I was saying about them struggling to find a place in the market.



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

Level 5 is overrated by forum goers here.

Tri-Ace is underrated by forum goers here.

It makes me sad.



Words cannot possibly express how much I fucking hate the term AAA.

That said, Tri-Ace has been WAYYYY down hill since Star Ocean 2, and Infinite Undiscovery seems to be downright bad.