I think that Star Ocean 4 is going to go to the PS3 so they could make more money just like FF13 is on the 360 so square could make more money its that simple

The metacritics of the games in debate:

DGVIII: 89
Dark Cloud 2: 87

Star Ocean til the end of time: 80
Star Ocean the second story: 80

So there's a difference between the best of each developer, but nothing massive.

I would call Level 5 better, but not that Tri-ace is bad or anything.  They're both good developers by anyone's scale.

the whole ending confused the hell out of me in Star Ocean 3 but I still think it was a good game and i am one of the few people that liked Radiata Stories but when I played Infinte Undiscovery I was dissopointed not because it was a bad game but because it was not Tri Ace

Seriously who cares?

Star Ocean is on the 360 and WK is on the PS3, it's like comparing Halo to Killzone, it only works on the marketing front.

According to metacritic the worst game that Level 5 made was better that every tri-Ace game
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps2/roguegalaxy?q=Rogue%20Galaxy

Ah yeah, the typical JRPG cliché. Most of them end in a pretty freaky way if you ask me. That's what I like about them though! For example, I remember when I was at the very last area in Tales of Symphonia and learned about everything right at the end, the culminating point is always a satisfying moment in RPG! =P

You fucks pulling up all these Metacritic scores are idiots. Who gives a shit about reviews? Honestly. Going by that shit is the dumbest thing any gamer can do.

Where did this come from? Is this because tri-Ace had the audacity to make 360 games whereas every Sony fanboy and their mother has been hyping WKC despite its inevitable bombing like the majority of Level 5 games?

Level 5 wishes it was on tri-Ace's level. The only established franchises Level 5 have had since conception are Dragon Quest (which they don't own and could be removed from entirely by DQX) and Professor Layton to a lesser extent. Dark Cloud bombed, Rogue Galaxy had modest sales but was fairly forgettable since Level 5 wanted it to be their equivalent to Final Fantasy, and Inazuma Eleven remains to be seen. So far, Level 5's best can barely challenge tri-Ace's worst, but it's not really fair when you've got an older and better developer like tri-Ace and randomly match them up against a developer still struggling to find a place and some relevance in the amrket like Level 5, just because some Sony fanboys a feeling a bit insecure about a game they had no business hyping to astronomical levels in the first place based on past history.

if you have any better way to argue over who's opinion is better than go for it, Valkyria. Review averages are the only thing even close to being values we can compare to talk about the quality of games. Otherwise we all just have to give up and admit that noone's opinion is better than anyone else and everyone has their favorite series.

Don't flame other users.  This is your only warning.