Not a good comparison.

General widsom dictates:

1. The 360 arguably has the best library amongst competing consoles. The PSP arguably doesn't.

2. The 360 is the cheapest console amongst its competitors. The PSP is the most expensive.

3. The 360 has a great christmas lineup and beyond. The PSP is in a gaming drout as confirmed by release schedule, Sony, and most PSP owners on this forum in several related topics.

4. The 360 just had a large price cut, and is giving away expensive games for free. The PSP isn't doing either thing.

5. The 360's main competitors, the Wii and PS3, both have problems of their own. The PSP's main competitor is one of the most successful consoles of all time, has 3rd party support beyond belief, an amazing library, is backwards compatable with the most successful console of all time, and is popular beyond belief in all regions.

So, once again, that's a very poor comparison. I can say that without getting into what each console "deserves" like we did in another topic.

I disagree. People don't buy the PSP for a completely different reason than why people don't buy the PSP.

As far as "better value" deals, Sony fanboys would tell you that the PS3 is a "better value deal" than the 360.

Those deals are a symptom of poor sales, yes, but that's where the similarity ends. It's like saying John and Mack must have the same disease because they are both coughing.

Coughing is a symptom of many diseases.

Your point is correct, however your comparison from before is still poor.