By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kytiara said:
Tispower said:
Kytiara said:

Here's another analogy. Say we are talking about the car industry. You have some high performance cars like Porches and Ferraris ok? You also have Honda selling the NSX. Then Honda decides to create and sell the Civic. The civic is more appealing to the non car enthousiast. Honda also still sells the NSX though for those car enthousiasts. Is Honda ruining the car industry?

What if they expand their normal car lines to include all sorts of other models that the non car enthousiasts like, still retaining the NSX for those with the cash and drive to buy and maintain one? When do they start ruining the car industry because they aren't solely targetting the core enthousiast market?


I guess that's a pretty good analogy. Apart from the fact that THEY DON'T MAKE THE NSX ANYMORE!!!!! I'm sorry, but that it complete ignorance on your part. In the Same way that Nissan only makes boring cars as they don't make the Skyline anymore. It was almost the same with Ford, although they redeemed themselves by creating the Ford GT (however that's noit really a good example as it is completely different to their normal cars). Seriously, the only way a car company has ever been successful at satisfying different types of customers is by creating an extra part of them, or buying another company. Ie Toyota has Lexus, Nissan has Infiniti, Honda has Acura, VW and Audi are one and the same, GM has Jaguar and did have Aston Martin.

IMO it is impossible to cater for 2 different types of customers. One of them is going to lose.

Oh god, fine pick one they do make. Sheesh, it was a f***ing example. Use the S2000 then if you want. Or the Nissan 350Z.

You made my point for me anyway. Honda has Acura, Toyota has Lexus, Nissan has Infinity. All those companies sell cars aimed at the mass market and cars aimed at the enthousiast. They haven't damaged the car enthousiast market at all. If you accept the predictions of those Anti-Nintendo people, then Ferrari and Porshe should have gone out of business along time ago.

Next time, don't just nit pick about details, take the entire example and use it sheesh.

 


Are you seriously comparing an S2000 or 350Z to a Ferrari or Porsche (as you mentioned first of all)? So that would be 200bhp to 450?

My point was they have to create a different branch of their company or something so aim for 2 different types of consumers, they cannot do it being one complete company.

Sorry if I came across as brash, I just don't like it when people are ignorant :P



One person's experience or opinion never shows the general consensus

PSN ID: Tispower

MSN: tispower1@hotmail.co.uk

Around the Network
javierdacosta said:
Kytiara said:

Here's another analogy. Say we are talking about the car industry. You have some high performance cars like Porches and Ferraris ok? You also have Honda selling the NSX. Then Honda decides to create and sell the Civic. The civic is more appealing to the non car enthousiast. Honda also still sells the NSX though for those car enthousiasts. Is Honda ruining the car industry?

What if they expand their normal car lines to include all sorts of other models that the non car enthousiasts like, still retaining the NSX for those with the cash and drive to buy and maintain one? When do they start ruining the car industry because they aren't solely targetting the core enthousiast market?


The problem I see is ferrari building slow SUV and forgetting about being the fastest car around... that would dissapoint lots of ferrari fans, right?

 

Porsche tried that, but what they've ended uo with is basically a Porsche on steroids, it's not much good off-road, it's just 4x as big.

 



One person's experience or opinion never shows the general consensus

PSN ID: Tispower

MSN: tispower1@hotmail.co.uk

"Nintendo has found a way to make money with low budget, crappy mini-game compilations and fitness games, so that's where they'll stick to... The only thing you should expect is more rehashed franchises."
Wow what a great post, and your comment is totaly off base. Rehashed franchises? You could say that about Sony and MS as well, mini game compilations, they do have a few so what?

Just say you dont like Nintendo and there games and be done with it. I think Nintendo is leading this industry in a very good way. The company has taken a lot of very unique ideas and put them out there for the market to judge. The ds is selling very well and the wii is selling very good as well.

Also ya Nintendo does like money, it keeps the employees happy and enables them to make games. You know the mini games, the kid games and lets not forget the rehased franchises.



mancandy said:
konnichiwa said:
nintendo_fanboy said:
well but konnichiwa, NOBODY announced new games at E3! Please tell me a game that has been announced only at E3 and we didn't know about before. I don't think there are more than five worth mentioning, one of them is Mario Kart.

 Let we go ten years ago in the past when Nintendo 64 was launched me as an Nintendo fanboy that time was one of the happiest boys in the world.  I see my old friends in 3D and I can tell you I was almost crying when I saw Mario in 3D and the same with Zelda but when I was playing N64 I made some new friends like Banjo Kazooie who were damned so great I am pretty sure when you think about your N64 you are probably thinking about the great time you had with Banjo Kazooie and Perfect Dard and golden Eye...

 

But now ten years later they don't surprise me anymore, Okay we have mario again, Metroid but when I was watching
the NIntendo conference 07 I was expecting Miyamoto would jump on the floor and introduce a new character into
the nintendo universe just for example Zario the crazy evil half blood brother of Mario who lives in Russia who is so 
scary that Bowser and Wario are shitting their pants of when they see him.

And make an game about him.

 

I mean Miyamoto is the best or one of the best gaming developpers of the world I can not believe he
doesn't have any ideas anymore.

I just want that kind of magic back when I played the Snes and was introduced to Donkey Kong country or N64
banjo Kazooie.

I miss it.

And if you are happy about it okay but I miss it. 

You really have to make up your mind. First you complain that Nintendo is ruining the gaming industry for making new IPs and creating new genres and making games to capture casual gamers. Now you complain that they are not making new IPs.

They have made new IPs, Wii Sports, Wii Play, Wii Fit, Nintendogs, Brain Age.

Now you go to the tired old arguement that Nintendo is still holding on to their old IPs. Here's a hint fanboy: ALL COMPANIES DO THAT. Ten years ago there was Silent Hill, MGS, Street Fighter, Resident Evil, Tekken, GT, Final Fantasy, Doom, blahblahblah. Why do fanboys think Nintendo is the only one that does this? Why don't you call up Sony and tell them to be a little more creative and stop calling their machines Playstations? 

 


 Sigh I don't call Wii sports, Wii Play, Wii fit, Nintendogs, Brain age new games they are made for non gamers.
 Yes other companies do it to but on X360 and PS3 I see some new franchises from developpers I never thought of.   Epic would have a sure hit with only bringing Unreal III but they didn't they made a whole new game called Gears of Wars and then you have many other franchises who will come or have been released, Bioshock,Mass effect, Kameo, Viva Pinata, Crackdown  and on PS3 the most of the games are new franchises this year,  Heavenly Sword, Lair, Uncharted, Resistance, Motorstorm, Eight Days, Warhawk, Timeshift, Army of Two, Assasins creed, Bladestorm, .....






cdude1034 said:

If Halo were ported to the Wii, or MGS4 or GTA were ported the Wii, we would not be having this argument. The games most of you guys like to quote, the WiiFit, Metroid 3, they're 1st party games.

Bitch bitch bitch.

Seriously guys, Nintendo has never made a "hardcore" game, and they probably never will. They have all they'll ever want in Mario, Pokemon, etc.

It's up the the third parties to make Nintendo hardcore.


I guess the way you define "hardcore" is quite narrow-minded. 
"Hardcore" do not require killing, shooting, and rampage.    

Here's what I posted on other site: 

Despite Nintendo’s focus on casual gamers, there already are titles for core gamers such as SMG, SSBB, MP3, RE4, Manhunt, Scarface, etc and this list keeps growing.

This begs the question about the gamers who claim that Wii abandoned them: What do they want? When will they say Wii have games for them?

First of all, who are they? These gamers are most likely male typically between high teen and mid 20s who like, simply put, violence. They appreciate gruesome killing and also prefer serious/darker storylines such as war.

These players consider these violent and darker games as “core game” and reject everything else. They refuse to classify the existing core titles for Wii saying that graphics are subpar/kiddy-ish and that there is not enough violence.

What these players are missing is that violence and realistic graphics/design are not the defining factors of “core-ness”.

Instead “core-ness” involves various factors of gameplay such as control scheme, the clarity and depth of storyline, creativity in designing challenges, the structure of game-progression, replayability, etc.

Unless these young gamers start take into account of these variety of factors that contribute to the overall quality of gameplay experience, they will keep saying Nintendo has nothing to offer them and will keep calling gruesome killng sprees as “true core games”.

Given this mindset, It’s quite pointless to argue with them if there is core games or not for wii. Once they get older, maybe in late 20s and 30s, they will perhaps gradually start to appreciate the broad range of factors that enhance our gaming experience.

 

If you believe games like Halo and GTA are hardcore and Nintendo games aren't, I suggest you just keep playing XBOX or whatever and be happy.  Just don't bother promulgating your narrow definition of core games.



No, it's not going to stop  'Til you wise up
No, it's not going to stop  So just ... give up
- Aimee Mann

Around the Network
Punch Rockgroin said:
Nintendo should just conform and produce nothing but space marine shooters. Mario and his crew need to be updated. Make the mushroom kingdom some distant planet and the Marios are an elite squad of soldiers/ex-football players. Just think about walking around and shooting goombas over and over and over and over. Fuck puzzles and platforming. I wanna blow stuff up.

Same with Zelda. Place it in the year 2232 where Link should be a part of Hyrules National Army and Zelda should be like the presidents daughter. Only no pussy sword fighting. Can you imagine fragging Ganondorf?
Star Fox should also be grounded with a few sparse Arwing missions thrown in so I can blow stuff up in space in between blowing stuff up on ground. Also, make Fox human.
Kirby should be some blob that consumes people in an open world environment. Think monster movie meets sandbox game. But I can still pick up hookers... and shoot stuff. In fact, Kirby should be the antagonist in the game.
Donkey Kong should be a monkey with attitude who goes around shooting random people, throwing barrels and making them slip on banana peels.
The Mario Party games should be a bunch of minigames where I can shoot stuff. Story don't matter here. If it's pretty and I get to shoot stuff, I'm there.

That'll get the hardcore gamers. I'm sure of it. And it won't destroy gaming with things like 'variety' or 'fun'.
:D you summed up some of the ridiculousness of some peoples thinking there! Man that was funny =)

 



One person's experience or opinion never shows the general consensus

PSN ID: Tispower

MSN: tispower1@hotmail.co.uk

I posted this in another thread and thought it was relevant to this one. It sums up what I expect out of Nintendo and all game publishers for that matter.

How about (gasp!) a new IP that isn't strictly aimed at casuals (Wii Sports, WiiFit, etc.) i.e. a "real" game. I will go ahead and count Wii Sports, but Wii Fit doesn't exactly "fit" the criteria (sorry about the pun). It's not really that hard. Sony and Microsoft (who supposedly aren't that innovative) can do it.

Sony new IP's:

Infamous
Uncharted
Echochrome
Heavenly Sword
Lair
Little Big Planet
Folklore
White Knight Story
and counting ones already released this generation
Resistance
Motorstorm

And on the PSN:

Flow
Calling all Cars
Pain

Microsoft new IP's:

Mass Effect
Crackdown
Alan Wake
Too Human
Vampire Rain (still counts even if bad)
Shadowrun
Blue Dragon
Lost Odyssey
A few more I forgot

Nintendo - rehashed IP's versus new ones on the Wii.

Rehashed:
Legend of Zelda: TP
Fire Emblem
Super Mario Galaxy
Metroid Prime
Smash Bros. Brawl
Mario Kart Wii
Mario Party 8
Big Brain Academy: Wii Degree
probably some more I am missing

New IP's:

Wii Sports
Wii Music (haven't heard from this one in awhile)
Project H.A.M.M.E.R. (o wait...)
Disaster (this one is questionable, may or may not see the light of day)
WarioWare Smooth Moves (uses the Wario name, but I will count it cause it is different)
Wii Fit

There you have it. Feel free to add any if I missed some, particularly on the Nintendo side, cause I would like to hear some more. No seriously, I am asking you to. D.S. games aside (which have, even if they aren't traditional, seen some new IP's like Nintendogs, Brain Age, etc. although there are plenty of remakes like all of the N64 rehashes), Nintendo has not been as creative as people give them credit for.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson

This is funny.

1. There are plenty of 'core' non-mini or 'casual' games coming. Both new and old-school vc games to keep any core gamer happy. Lists are abound.
2. Wii's online service is just fine. You can play tons of people you have never met anonymously or trade friend codes with your family/friends to play directly with certian people. True, it would be nice to have a headset, but hearing some 12 year old speak like a sailor while he is shooting you isn't that great either.
3. Nintendo's vision is just fine. Create a whole new market to bring in new gamers and thus grow the community. Many of them might play the core games as well. All the while still producing top notch core games that the base wants. Meanwhile that same base will probably buy quite a few of the casual games. I know I will buy some.

Plus, this is ignoring 3rd parties. Whomever has the largest base and momentum will get the most 3rd party attention. Thus, tons of other great core games cometh.



akuma587 said:
I posted this in another thread and thought it was relevant to this one. It sums up what I expect out of Nintendo and all game publishers for that matter.

How about (gasp!) a new IP that isn't strictly aimed at casuals (Wii Sports, WiiFit, etc.) i.e. a "real" game. I will go ahead and count Wii Sports, but Wii Fit doesn't exactly "fit" the criteria (sorry about the pun). It's not really that hard. Sony and Microsoft (who supposedly aren't that innovative) can do it.

Sony new IP's:

Infamous
Uncharted
Echochrome
Heavenly Sword
Lair
Little Big Planet
Folklore
White Knight Story
and counting ones already released this generation
Resistance
Motorstorm

And on the PSN:

Flow
Calling all Cars
Pain

Microsoft new IP's:

Mass Effect
Crackdown
Alan Wake
Too Human
Vampire Rain (still counts even if bad)
Shadowrun
Blue Dragon
Lost Odyssey
A few more I forgot

Nintendo - rehashed IP's versus new ones on the Wii.

Rehashed:
Legend of Zelda: TP
Fire Emblem
Super Mario Galaxy
Metroid Prime
Smash Bros. Brawl
Mario Kart Wii
Mario Party 8
Big Brain Academy: Wii Degree
probably some more I am missing

New IP's:

Wii Sports
Wii Music (haven't heard from this one in awhile)
Project H.A.M.M.E.R. (o wait...)
Disaster (this one is questionable, may or may not see the light of day)
WarioWare Smooth Moves (uses the Wario name, but I will count it cause it is different)
Wii Fit

There you have it. Feel free to add any if I missed some, particularly on the Nintendo side, cause I would like to hear some more. No seriously, I am asking you to. D.S. games aside (which have, even if they aren't traditional, seen some new IP's like Nintendogs, Brain Age, etc. although there are plenty of remakes like all of the N64 rehashes), Nintendo has not been as creative as people give them credit for.

This would be a reasonable position if the "hardcore gamer" crowd was clearly still growing, but it's not, I suspect.

Nintendo is making as many hardcore games as they always have -- I think that's been made clear. It's really a separate complaint; you are no longer arguing that Nintendo isn't making hardcore games, you're just arguing that they aren't making EVEN MORE hardcore games. Nintendo has recognized that the number of "core" gamers has stabilized, and that there really isn't a great deal of room for growth in this sector. Which is absolutely validated by sales; every PS3 game save Resistance and Motorstorm has lost money, according to all of the analysis I've seen (break-even point for PS3 games seems to be around 500-600k, depending on whether you ask Namco or an Lazard, and only those two titles have reached that milestone at the moment. That's right -- only two games on the PS3, total, have passed 500k units sold).

It's kind of unfair to try to switch the argument like this, Akuma. Once we've proven that Nintendo is still making hardcore games, you then swap out that argument for "well, okay, but why aren't they making eveb more hardcore games than ever before?"



http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a324/Arkives/Disccopy.jpg%5B/IMG%5D">

So I guess all those 100 million people who bought PS2's just disappeared off the face of the earth. That was what made the system so appealing to me DIVERSITY. I could care less about nothing but rehashed IP's or new IP's aimed at my grandmother.



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson