I would have called it even. The guy's a PS3 fan so he tied things in the graphics department. That should've went to Gears.

MM dont get me wrong i think i like the ps3 more than the 360 but Gears2>Resistance 2 i just cant find what is so good about resistance... i just found it a pretty standar game with some good things but nothing extraordinary, and yeah i am not going to buy a game for a 100 feet monster xD

300 feet....  freakin idiot, GoD!

 LOL, are you a fuking retard i dont know exactly how big it is, because i got more important things to worry than learning that a stupid monster from a game its 300 feet and not 100 feet, its not my problem that you are a stupid that didnt even get to the university and spends all his day learning stupid shits like oh that monster is 300 feet high, you know something it doesnt even exists =) i am sure you didnt know that.. fuking kid

I think you might want to get your sarcasm detector looked at, you won't last long here without it.

gebx said:
Since when does gameplay = Weapons??

Only when a fair comparison of the mechanics would skew the results.  Also I'm loving the quotes in your sig.

1. Gears of War war was great, Resistance not that much. Check metacritic
2. Weapons =/= gameplay! It is stupid to judge about a games gameplay when it is not even released. It is even more stupid to compare two not released games gameplays and it is the most stupid to compare two not released games gameplay on weapons you just saw on trailers.
3. Same goes for multiplayer.

obviously, this guy has never seen Napoleon Dynamite. 

Well, I guess that's the last time I make a Napoleon dynamite reference. Someone's reminiscing of their own past failures lol.

I'll be the honorary Xbot.

"itz just anutha PS3fanboi saying R2 is betta. we allz kno Geaus 2 is the hotness.  3604ever"