Million said:
Good point ,PS2 would still be selling good with strong software support. |
And allow MS to dominate the HD market? no.
Million said:
Good point ,PS2 would still be selling good with strong software support. |
And allow MS to dominate the HD market? no.
Xen said:
And allow MS to dominate the HD market? no.
|
Domination doesn't neccaserily mean profitability , Sony could have saved themselves $3-7 Billion by not releasing the PS3.
I think there is still a long way to go this gen.
Games are still improving as devs find new ways to exploit them.
ot I dont really care as long as the console is good.
I hold no allegience to any of them.
Can anyone really afford to sit it out? Nintendo could have possibly sat out the 16-bit era and simply kept pushing the Nes (like they almost did). The end result would have been a loss of market share, name recognition, and profit. Not to mention the experience and innovations of working with cutting edge technology.
Any company that takes a generation off is pretty much comitting suicide!
Nintendo can't because their hardware as good as it is now will not be tolerated by devs or consumers in 2016.
MS needs to make a new console because of the RRoD stigma.
Sony could make their system as a gaming standard which lasts for 10 years (not 6 then new console) which is something that could attract people who hate to change consoles, then make PS4 a fairly expensive machine too and make the same 10 year promise (advertise it as the buy it forever machine).
Plus it's still gonna be blu-ray player even when they quit making games for it (and a cheap one at that in 5 years), heck people will still be using PS2s they get from yard sales for DVD players for years to come.
The problem with any of them skipping a gen is whether the 3rd parties will still support their system in 2016.
Kickin' Those Games Old School. - 201 Beaten Games And Counting

None. But if I have to pick one, it will be nintendo. It offers nothing for me.
| d21lewis said: Can anyone really afford to sit it out? Nintendo could have possibly sat out the 16-bit era and simply kept pushing the Nes (like they almost did). The end result would have been a loss of market share, name recognition, and profit. Not to mention the experience and innovations of working with cutting edge technology. Any company that takes a generation off is pretty much comitting suicide! |
Sony could..Or sony needs, that would be main reason for keeping 10 year for ps3.
Take my love, take my land..
As much as I am a fan towards one console (360) part of the fun and excitement of having a console is the competitiveness. Without the consoles competing and going all out then the company doesn't have to put out as much, cut prices as much, and basically bend over backwards as much.
I enjoy the console wars. Because in the end the consumer wins. Unless of course you bought a Dreamcast. Sorry guys.
| slimeattack said: Sony should and no one else. Who would buy a console with PS2 graphics in 2016? |
Why would they be selling the PS2 in 2016?
Onimusha12 said:
Why would they be selling the PS2 in 2016?
|
I meant that the Wii (with PS2 graphics) won't be selling in 2016.