By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 360/PS3 comparisons?

Jo21 said:
ps3 colors are better, red looks red, whites its pure white.

the rest exactly the same.

 

Comments like that could end the detente we built up on the other thread.  You have to admit that the diffences really are so smal (and I am not admitting there are) that they dont matter correct?



PS3, WII and 360 all great systems depends on what type of console player you are.

Currently playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Halo ODST and Dragon Age Origins is next game

Xbox live:mywiferocks

Around the Network
colonelstubbs said:
Multiplatform games, there is still no real noticeable difference. Its the exclusives that hold the key

 

Agree and it has a lot to do with the TV that you are using.  I know it is all personal preferance, but I own all 3 current gen consoles.  I for one go for the 360 game if it is a multiplatform game, reason, xbox live and I like the 360 controler much better.  It does not cramp my hands near as much.



Consoles: Atari 5200, NES, SNES, N64, Dreamcast, PS2, Gamecube, Wii, Xbox 360, PS3

Can't say which ones look better, but it's clear that multi-platform PS3 games have improved enough to be practically identical. Isn't that enough?



they both play video games, both use controllers, both use electricity, both cost money. they both use discs and they both waste way too much of people's time.



They really do look the same, and if there is a difference it's too small to be of any real significance.



I'm a filmmaker, writer, and gamer. Add me on Xbox Live or message me!

XBL Gamertag: StraitupBeastin

Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
BrayanA said:
Better? No I don't think so.
Stop at 0:06. What you see ...
Let me help you. Lack of anti-aliasing in the ps3 version!

 

That's it's biggest issue. I love the PS3 but a lot of multis lack the anti-aliasing that it's 360 counterparts have and that all boils down to the GPUs of both consoles (yes the 360s is better), however other recent multis have not suffered from this on PS3 i.e. NHL 2009, Madden 2009, Fifa Soccer 2009, some of these yes I'm judging by their demos but NHL 2K9 is one multi recently that still has those issues.The PS3 has more processing power however so it's exclusives set it apart from 360 games as they should. IMO Uncharted and MGS4 are hands down the best this generation has to offer followed closely by Gears of War. But it's all a matter of taste, each console be it PS3 or 360 has it's ups and downs. PS3 excels in animation and Physics, whereas the 360 excels in textures due to PS3's lack of video memory. The 360s 512mb of RAM are solely used to push textures, even though like I said Uncharted is an example of PS3's (PIXEL PUSHING POWERS)!!! But in terms of anti-aliasing the 360 has the advantage.

To be honest I looked closely at the AA of both systems and it looks about the same. Neither version have aliasing issues so a little bit more or better AA on the Xbox 360 version which is what I saw is unlikely to sway people either way.

 



Tease.

16 secs in the PS3 audience is clearer but it is further from the cam. 360 version is blurry with the audience but the same scene has the cam focused more on the players and not on the whole scene. 360 has the anti-aliasing advantage.



Bottom line I think we would all agree no one is going to buy a PS3 over a 360 or a 360 over the PS3 because of the graphics its too close. There are many other reasons why one would but one over the other but that is for another thread



PS3, WII and 360 all great systems depends on what type of console player you are.

Currently playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Halo ODST and Dragon Age Origins is next game

Xbox live:mywiferocks

DrStephenTColbert said:
It doesn't matter which version looks better. Nobody is buying NHL 2K9.

 

Lawl! I bet Canadian sales of this game is 5x what it sells everywhere else.

Anyhow, I don't know why these little differences matter. When you're drawn into the game, do you really notice these little details? With DMC, GTA, SC, and now this... I think unless there's a large enough difference where you notice it without specifically looking for it, it really doesn't matter.

 

 




PSN: chenguo4
Current playing: No More Heroes

jrix said:
davygee said:

Are we now getting to a stage where the PS3 has caught up and may even begin to pull away?

Check out the latest GT comparison with NHL 2K9.

Check it out in HD on GT.

See what you think?

One thing I did notice myself was the reflections on the glass surrounding the ice as well as the reflections on the ice of the players. Noticably better on the PS3.

What do you think?

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/39895.html

umh.. Ign head 2 head says:

 

Graphics
NHL 2009 is a great looking sports game on both the PS3 and 360. Players animate in some impressive ways, stumbling out of hits, scrambling to maintain puck control, and sprinting down the ice with terrific realism. Your skates will leave marks across the ice as your players skate, and the crowds are fully rendered models that help add to the stadium atmosphere. Player models have a nice amount of detail as well. In close ups you'll see the little air holes in jerseys, bumpy textures on gloves, and the shiny glare on helmets. In replays and the cinematic intros before each game you'll see a nice depth of field effect that adds a layer of realism and immersion.

The PS3 and 360 versions of the game are almost indistinguishable graphically. Both look terrific and run at a stable framerate. You'll notice a lot of hitching in the PS3 version when going through menu screens. When simulating events in Dynasty mode, for instance, the highlight box around the current date will get hung up half way in between two calendar dates while the AI simulates other games for just a split second. There are also some minor framerate dips during the intro movies when the game cuts to a new shot, but this happens in both versions. I noticed some random visual bugs with replays where the puck disappeared or some strange collision detection had player's arms passing through the goal post. These were rare and occurred in both the PS3 and 360 versions. NHL 2009 is a terrific visual rendition of hockey and will give you just as good an experience on the PS3 as the 360.

Overall
As Nate mentioned in his review, NHL 2009 is simply, "one of the best sports games to be released in the last decade." Befitting of such a high caliber game, EA has done an outstanding job of creating an identical experience with that core game on both the PS3 and 360. You'll get all the same modes, the same graphical polish, the same terrifically mixed sound, and the same core controls. Having spent extensive time with both versions for a solid week, I'm comfortable recommending either version to fans of the NHL. Fundamentally, NHL 2009 is the same core experience on both PS3 and 360.

Experienced gamers may have their own particular inclinations about which controller they prefer. The PS3 controls work just as well as the 360 version, but the longer sticks do require some adjustment if you switch back and forth between the two versions. The 360 has Achievements on its side, but the game is so absurdly deep and layered that the Achievements add as much to the experience as the bit of parsley that garnishes your cheeseburger and fries. The lone remaining issue I experienced was with the perpetual menu hitching in the PS3 version. It's a noticeable irritation, but in truth it adds a half second or so to the process and ultimately doesn't affect the gameplay. The final truth is NHL 2009 is one of the most balanced multiplatform games yet. The game is just as good on PS3 as it is on Xbox 360.

 

 

NHL 2k9 != NHL 09.