theworldendswithme said:
Every other genre of art has an extensive body of rigorous, scholarly criticism of its canon, replete with theories and anaylses of recurring forms. In The Anxiety of Influence, Harold Bloom discusses the process of canon formation and how artists are inevitably influenced by their predecessors. Only those artists that can harmonize the rigid structures of tradition with original creative thought can hope to amount to more than a cliché.
|
Yeah. It could also be that video games are primarily commercial art. Still, games are games. Would the person that created the game of Chess be considered a great artist? Is the game of Go a work of art?
Poker, Monopoly, Risk, Bridge and Golf... we have a wide-range of games already created to inspect and look for the scholarly criticism, theories and analyses of recurring forms.
It would be interesting to see if video games could be critiqued by an academic social commentator who also plays them but I have yet to see that happen. Nowadays you can call anything art. But can you say that video games are art (with a straight face) and be taken seriously by the academic establishment? Aye, there's the rub.