Rogue Leader definitly deserved it's high praise--it didn't get 99's or anything like that, but it got high praise that was accurate.  Rebel Strike also deserved the negatives that it received.

wow ahh 57% compared to other games there are barley any better so i dont see how it gets a 57%

I'm a Wii owner and I liked Halo.  Halo really shined as a multiplayer affair, though I do get some of the complaints about it.  I played it, like a lot of gamers, around the same time as I played Metroid Prime 1 the first time.  I found Halo's environments to be huge, the battles to be intense, and the multiplayer to be fun.  However, I also found many of the environments (especially interior) to be surprisingly bland with flat (both physically and in color), often boring design.  Metroid Prime, on the other hand was awash with vibrant colors and nary a flat wall, floor, ceiling, or otherwise in the game.  Simply put, Metroid Prime, in many ways simply felt alive compared to Halo which at times felt very sterile.  It was almost too much of a shooter for it's own good. 

For Halo 1, I particularly liked the 2-player co-op campaign, which was a lot of fun.

Halo 2 had much better looking environments and multiplayer, I thought.  Halo 3, I felt was very pretty, but pretty soon I didn't care so much about the graphics as the gameplay itself was, unfortunately, exactly the same as the previous titles.  It was great because it was easier to pick up and play, but it felt like the only advancement was the graphics. 

The big difference is, I feel that players play Halo for shooter action, multiplayer mayhem and fun, while players play Metroid Prime for mood, atmosphere, story and exploration.  I think that it's the gamers that enjoy both is a smaller cross-section than the those that prefer one or the other.  This could be why a lot of Nintendo gamers maybe "don't get" Halo.  It's fun while it lasts, but feels somewhat shallow.  I know that when I played, I hardly even cared for the story--especially in part 3 and that's where Halo got hurt--I think it tried to focus on story and didn't bother to really evolve the control or gameplay.  And how many people are playing Halo for the story?

The Metroid Prime that focused on multiplayer is also the one that seems to have left a sour taste in fan's mouths, so to speak.  Granted, it didn't make multiplayer a heavy focus, but I still felt it was an unneeded addition that took away development from the core game.

Just a thought.

This review is ridiculous.

You say "It's not perfect like critics say, but it's not bad" and give a damn 7?

GTA IV is awesome, not perfect, but awesome. I had lots of fun playing it and still jump by now and then

I give it a 90%

Now why don't you review MGS 4 and say how the graphics weren't perfect so it deserve a 6.5?

Most definitely agree!

this ^^^

we can all agree that the most overrated game of all time on any gen was and still is Halo 3.
Halo 3 was a game with quality comparable to Halo 2, Microsoft called it the biggest media event of the centurary. not only that but tv ads started a year before its release.
the only difference between Halo 3 and Halo 2 are the graphics and the online play which isnt that good either.
Microsft even decided to scam the consumers by selling an over priced limited edition halo console without the game packaged in and they even have the guts to call the ps3 overpriced, where as sony did package mgs4 with their ps3, obviously at a highrùer price otherwise konami would loose out.

Haze is the most overrated game - GamePro gave it a 4.5/5.

ahahahahahah...no.

actually I thought it was Halo 3...