By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - 360 Price Cut & Sales

Fei-Hung said:
DirtyP2002 said:
Fei-Hung said:
mrstickball said:
slimeattack said:
Gamer4eva said:
Why do u guys think the price cut wont be that big?

 

The Arcade is a ridiculously gimped model, even at $199.

How is it gimped again?

 

because it's missing limbs that you require for it to be a full console:

1) Hard Drive ( how can you make the most of game saves, replays, custom music, dlc without one?)- its am ust and doesn't come cheap.

2) WIFI - granted not everyone needs it, but many do and again it doesn't come cheap.

3) if you add the prices for the 2 items that should really come with the console, then you not looking at $199 anymore. $199 is nothing more but a sales pitch that some unfortunate people who are not informed on consoles will fall for.

 

 

 I don't get what is bad about having choices? You can play the Arcade just for the singleplayer games, you want to play online, go and buy the package for it, (HDD, Headset, XBL-Membership).

If you like to play online straight away, buy the pro.

If you really need a lot of space on your HDD, because u r into Video on Demand and stuff, buy the elite.

I really like this idea.

you missing the point dude. if you are a gamer, you will need a Hard drive. Where else will you be able to download all those xbox games on the Live? if you are a gamer, then you will want to make the most of gaming so online will be needed considering one of the strongest selling points of the xbox brand has always been its online service. using logic, it should then be norm for MS to have the simplest console at a cheap price range but at least give the consumer what is needed to get the most out of the system.

yes, offering choices is great, but make the choices worthy at least. It's like selling you a car for £10 with no doors and saying that you shouldn't complain since it can get you from a-b and that is it's soul purpose. 

 

 

If a 360 purchaser wants to play games on Xbox Live, they have a great choice already - a $299 60GB model.  If a 360 purchaser doesn't even have broadband, but still wants to play the large and impressive physical media library available, why.... look at that!  They can buy a 360 for $199.

Sounds like you want to make the choice for consumers on what they should feel is a worthy value.  Sorry, but you don't get to make that decision - the consumers do.  If no consumers wanted to buy the Arcade model, MS would have cut it from the console selection long ago. 

And hey, if someone buys a $199 model and decides later on they really needed the hard drive, there's a $99 60GB upgrade kit with 3 months of live and a headset for them. 

Believe what you want, but not every potential console buyer has broadband to take advantage of Xbox Live.  Just like not every potential buyer has a 42"+ HDTV to take advantage of PS3's bluray drive.   But at least Xbox owners get a choice for what overpriced option they get, with a further choice to upgrade it necessary :O  snap.

 



Around the Network
mrstickball said:
The price cut will be big. There is some anecdotal information in the MS forums about it.

Give it a few days for retail outlet musings to pop up. IMO, I think that this price cut, getting the X360 below $200, will be a slow, but impressive burn when it comes to sales.

Oh, here's a few quotes for you:


When I first heard about this price drop, I figured it would only affect sales for a little while and then die off. Most console buyers, or maybe I should say "potential" console buyers, don't troll tech news websites like this one, and probably know nothing about this price drop, right?

Well, then I saw it on CNN and on the local Chicago news. Then yesterday on my way out of work, I heard something really mind blowing. The customer service department at my office, which consists of 5 people, 4 of which are over the age of 50, was talking about how the Xbox 360 was now going to be $199. Are these people all gamers? Nope. Not one of them is. But they all have kids and grandkids who want consoles this Christmas. And the Arcade will be the cheapest one out there this year.




Too late, tons already sold at Futureshop in here in Canada. In fact in their online store there is only 47 left, and the sale just started this morning!

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/pro...gon=&langid=EN

Y'know you make a dumbass comment and then it comes biting you in the ass like that...it's things like this that make life so beautiful.



So just got back from work. We sold 4 Arcades today (sold out now) and one Pro.

We haven't sold an Xbox 360 Arcade in months.


That's all I've seen thus far.

 

Again using anecdotal information? Did we learn anything from July NPD?



Fei-Hung said:
I think the simplest way to predict the 360 price cut outcome is using the following questions:

1) how many people want a 360? if the console is not in demand, a price cut won't make much of a difference.

2) how many people think the 360 arcade model is worth spending $199 on? everyone i know who has an arcade model (about a dozen friends), have all ended up having to pay for wifi and HDD. This brings the price of the console up by at least another $100 minimum.

3) what games are being released to make the system worthy of purchase? Currently there is GeoW2 and Fable2. Is there anything for the kids? Is there anything for the casual?

Conclusion: There will be a spike for those who are wanting a 360, but after these people have made there purchase, the numbers will drop again. There isn't enough appeal for the price cut to have a huge long term effect. If anything and as sad as this may sound, the only thing the 360 arcade will be competing with is the ps2 consumers. Although it may not sound much, but if this is a strategy, it is a great strategy. Kill the console that brings in profits for Sony to make up some of the losses on the ps3. However, MS doesn't seem to be using this reasoning or logic, they are after the Wii and PS3 consumers and this will be far more difficult to achieve having less and less on offer as time passes in the console life cycles.

1. well a pricecut is made to stimulate the demand...

2. Your friends are not the smartest guys out there, are they? Just buy the pro and everything is fine. You see the choise-system works just as long as people think about their choice. I guess your friends didn't.

3. for the kids: "Viva Pinata Trouble in Paradies", "Banjo Kazooie Nuts and bolts" for the casuals "Lips", "You are in the movies", "RockBand", "Guitar Hero"

And why has the 360 less to offer as time passes by? The library gets bigger and bigger, the marketplace gets bigger and bigger, New Xbox Live experience coming, former PS3-exclusives announced for 360, JRPGS coming, well what is the Xbox360 missing to offer?



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

Was perfect timing for me. I threw an event on Saturday and picked up 2 Arcades on Friday as raffle items. In the past I gave away a single pro.

 

Also as to the argument. Add $199.99 the Arcade will appeal to a new demographic that may only be interested in a few games and wont need a HDD or a WiFi connection. It also allows people to get in while saving up.  So they can pickup an Arcade now and maybe ask for a HDD for Christmas or simply save up for it.



Its libraries that sell systems not a single game.

FinalEvangelion said:
It will probably do enough to ensure that the PS3 doesn't catch up with the 360 before the 720 is released, which I'm sure MS will use to say that "they sold more than the PS3," even if LTD sales will favor the PS3 for start to end of production.

There is a big difference in reasons that Sony/Nintendo are in the gaming industry vs. MS.

Sony/Nintendo are in it to be in the industry and sell games and hardware. MS is in the industry to monopolize the industry and get into a position where they can fix prices like they do in the OS and Office applications.

 

You would be wrong on two accounts... both on Sony's and Microsoft, but I'll let you google it and find out for yourself the real reason Microsoft and Sony are in this buisness.



Around the Network
FinalEvangelion said:
It will probably do enough to ensure that the PS3 doesn't catch up with the 360 before the 720 is released, which I'm sure MS will use to say that "they sold more than the PS3," even if LTD sales will favor the PS3 for start to end of production.

There is a big difference in reasons that Sony/Nintendo are in the gaming industry vs. MS.

Sony/Nintendo are in it to be in the industry and sell games and hardware. MS is in the industry to monopolize the industry and get into a position where they can fix prices like they do in the OS and Office applications.

 

   Haha that is EXACTLY the way I look at it, and why I greatly prefer Nintendo and Sony to Microsoft.  Microsoft always talks a good open source/customer centered type game until they get the monopoly and then suddenly everything is 500 dollars or more and doesn't work right.

 

    As to the 360 price cut there is a point after which no amount of price cuts will help the 360.  There is a base of people who will buy the 360 (the teenage to early 20s gamerboy market) with very few outside of the demo interested at all.  Plenty of mainstream people have embraced Nindendo (wii, SNES, NES) and Sony (PS, PS2) systems, but never have they embraced MS and the 360 really doesn't seem to have any reasons for that to change.  What are the big 360 games?  Oh yah, yet another FPS game and an adult oriented RPG, thats going to bring in the kids and others thinking twice about the Xbox brand.

 

   All MS is doing is reaching its saturation point at about 30 million faster.  They will never reach the kind of main stream market numbers Nintendo and Sony can, they have a bad image outside of their core demographic.  I know a lot of friends buying consoles, many of them female, and the choice is always PS3 or Wii (the women usually pick Wii though thats a function of price as much as anything else, I think Little Big Planet and Home will help shift that a bit) the 360 never even enters into it.  Ditto for anyone I know with kids, the 360 isn't even on the table unless the kid is a boy over 14.




 PSN ID: ChosenOne feel free to add me

Impulsivity said:
FinalEvangelion said:
It will probably do enough to ensure that the PS3 doesn't catch up with the 360 before the 720 is released, which I'm sure MS will use to say that "they sold more than the PS3," even if LTD sales will favor the PS3 for start to end of production.

There is a big difference in reasons that Sony/Nintendo are in the gaming industry vs. MS.

Sony/Nintendo are in it to be in the industry and sell games and hardware. MS is in the industry to monopolize the industry and get into a position where they can fix prices like they do in the OS and Office applications.

 

 

Did you say something?

 



Tease.

In my opinion it comes down to this. the only SKU that Could have a real impact on numbers is the Srcade. Now for the most part the people that would be attracted to the $199 Arcade are the same people that would be attracted to the Wii. With the sheer demand and popularity of the Wii I seriously doubt that MS will Siphon that many buyers away from the Wii. Will there be some boost? I'd be shocked if there wasn't, but how much of a boost are we talking, and for how long? In Europe they got a Small to moderate boost that lasted less than a half a year, and in the end really didn't effect PS3 or Wii sales at all. It really does come down to Title recognition. In Europe people know names like Mario Kart and SSB. in the US people know Socom and metal gear Solid. What your average gamer doesn't know is Fable or even to some extent Gears of War (Yes Gears was popular, but it was popular to existing XBOX 360 owners) A price drop will help, but probvably not as much as 360 fanboys want to believe.



Squilliam said:
Impulsivity said:
FinalEvangelion said:
It will probably do enough to ensure that the PS3 doesn't catch up with the 360 before the 720 is released, which I'm sure MS will use to say that "they sold more than the PS3," even if LTD sales will favor the PS3 for start to end of production.

There is a big difference in reasons that Sony/Nintendo are in the gaming industry vs. MS.

Sony/Nintendo are in it to be in the industry and sell games and hardware. MS is in the industry to monopolize the industry and get into a position where they can fix prices like they do in the OS and Office applications.

 

 

Did you say something?

 

LOL.

 



It depends on whether consumers are willing to pay less to buy a console with many optional features left out. Although there might be tremendous peer pressure to get one WITH those optional features.

(No one likes to buy something knowing that they've left some tempting, albeit unnecessary parts, right?)



My collection of guides on GameFAQs: Read them here

My latest guide on GameFAQs, for Little King's Story! Read it here