By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - Xbox 360 defects: an inside history of Microsoft’s video game console woes

TheRealMafoo said:

Squilliam said:

OT: Nvidia recently fucked up and got a 40% failure rate on their GPUs. What does this mean? RROD could have happened to Sony just as easily. Its not that Microsoft is a screw up, its just that either Sony is Lucky or Microsoft is Unlucky depending on how you spin it. (Nvidia is the supplier of GPUs to Sony btw) 

 

When Nvidia does it, it's a "fuck up", but when MS does it, it's just them being "unlucky"?

Because Nvidia should have known better. Especially based upon the lessons from the Xbox 360. Because Nvidia did not forsee issues with the creeping temperatures and the problems it was causing the packaging, then how could Microsoft have forseen?

Sony is either lucky or unlucky depending on how you spin it because they could have bought a GPU with the same design flaw in the packaging as the Laptop GPUs which failed. They were all within specification in the Laptop designs and yet they failed, so put that same flaw into the PS3 and the failure rate would have skyrocketed.

 



Tease.

Around the Network
Domicinator said:
kjj4t9rdad said:
Vista = crap
Zune = crap
360 = crap
M$ can't do anything right. Why do people still buy there products?

 

1.  Most people who say Vista is crap have never even used it.  Vista is actually quite good--stable, secure, and nicely laid out.  (I have been using it since beta.)  It's perceived as crap mostly because it's not XP.  The driver issues were fixed within the first two months of launch, but nobody ever talks about that.  It's more fun to mindlessly bash.

 

2.  The Zune is a really cool device.  Would I ever buy one?  No, I'd rather put all my music on my Chocolate.  I don't own a Zune or an iPod, but I've used both quite a bit.  I know 5 Zune owners and they all love the thing.  My brother and sister-in-law liked theirs so much that they bought a second one so they'd quit fighting over it.  I've read several tech reviews that have agreed that the Zune's price, layout and functionality actually gives the iPod a run for its money.  It just doesn't have the little apple logo on the back, so again, it's perceived as crap and mindlessly bashed by idiots who have probably never used one.

3.  The 360 is an awesome console.  This opinion is of course subject to personal preference, much like the two above it.  It's fun for people to bash because its made by a company that everyone loves to hate.  The jokes about RRoD were well deserved when it was a prevalant issue, but I think most can agree now that it's not anywhere NEAR as much of a problem as it used to be.  And now the RRoD jokes always come off as a lame attempt to defend the PS3. 

4.  The most annoying thing about your post is the "M$" thing.  The 90's called, they want their forum joke back. 

But anyway, thanks for your enlightening response to the article.  And by the way, posting this in the MS forum is obvious flame bait, and I really don't see the purpose of it anyway.

 

I agree completely with #2.  I haven't used Vista so I wouldn't know.



TheRealMafoo said:
Domicinator said:

Any statement about Windows copying Mac OS is complete ignorance.  A research group at Xerox back in the 70's and 80's developed the windows type interface that BOTH operating systems use.  BOTH companies liked it and did their own take on it.  Apple made a cottage industry out of suing Microsoft back in the 80's claiming that Microsoft stole their Windows idea, when really they both took the idea from Xerox. And why is Vista

So the Zune is a copy of the iPod?  How about all the other MP3 players out there?  How about that Samsung Instinct?  Copy of the iPhone, right?  Are you honestly saying that the iPod is the only MP3 player that has a right to exist and that no other company should try to compete with it?  That's ridiculous.  There are jillions of other MP3 players out there that look like the iPod.  You only rip on MS because they're MS.  And for the record, the Zune is a better MP3 player than the iPod.

 

lol, you don't know me very well. I make my living as a Microsoft Developer, and have a CS degree. In order to get that, you need to take history of computing. I don't need to take history however to know about MS. I had a PC in 1980, and have owned every OS they have ever made. I have an MSDN license, and thus all MS software is available to me. I have evaluated, or utilized most of it.

MS does a lot of things well, very well. But there consumer offerings (not servers/dev tools) are all direct copies of competitors.

There is not enough time in the day to explain to you how OSX is better then Vista. Also comparing these OS's to what came out of Xerox PARC is ridiculous. Oh, and Steve Jobs asked Xerox if they could have the Alto 88's OS (and the mouse). Bill Gates then Stole the Mac design when Apple gave a prototype of the Mac to MS so they could write applications for it. If you think that's the same thing, you should be the last one throwing the word "ignorance" around.

And yes, the Instinct is a copy of the IPhone.

 

No, please, explain to me why OSX is better.  I'd love to know, because I think Mac OS is a steaming pile of crap.  And I think you misunderstand me, I know the Instinct is a copy of the iPhone, and there will be many more copies.  I'd venture to guess that most of them will be an improvement on the iPhone.  But since they won't have the little silver apple logo on them, they'll be considered garbage by people who don't know any better.  And that's what Apple's customer base is all about:  people who don't know any better.  People who fall for the most ridiculous advertising.  People who think that you can't burn a CD on anything but a Mac.

You don't know me very well either.  Please don't waste your breath on me by trying to convince me that Mac OS is better.  That's a ridiculous waste of time because it's all about personal preference.  Also, I'm in the IT business too.  I'm no "Microsoft Developer" (which could mean just about anything.  Hell, you could be developing a new calculator for Windows for all I know.) but I do know that a computer science degree is a far cry from making you an expert on anything.  I recently switched jobs, and I didn't talk to ONE prospective employer in the Chicago area who gave a rat's ass about computer science degrees.  So, don't bother with the credentials, because I actually don't give a rat's ass either. 

What came out of PARC is the very reason why the myth still exists that Microsoft "stole" the Windows concept from Apple.  Both companies went to Xerox to look at the interface and both companies used it in their own way.  And in case you hadn't noticed, Vista looks nothing like OSX.  Yes, it has gadgets, but if it had that absolutely ridiculous software dock I would give up completely and switch to Linux.  The Unix system that Apples are based on is every bit as archaic as the kernel Windows is built on.  Fortunately, Microsoft is actively plugging holes and patching exploits while Apple is sitting there telling their users that Macs simply don't get viruses or malware.




Great article, it's interesting to read about what's most likely been going on with the 360 since launch, very interesting that they quoted repair costs at $60, I was thinking more along the lines of $100+, but then I guess I figured in more failed parts.



Domicinator said:

 

No, please, explain to me why OSX is better.  I'd love to know, because I think Mac OS is a steaming pile of crap.  And I think you misunderstand me, I know the Instinct is a copy of the iPhone, and there will be many more copies.  I'd venture to guess that most of them will be an improvement on the iPhone.  But since they won't have the little silver apple logo on them, they'll be considered garbage by people who don't know any better.  And that's what Apple's customer base is all about:  people who don't know any better.  People who fall for the most ridiculous advertising.  People who think that you can't burn a CD on anything but a Mac.

You don't know me very well either.  Please don't waste your breath on me by trying to convince me that Mac OS is better.  That's a ridiculous waste of time because it's all about personal preference.  Also, I'm in the IT business too.  I'm no "Microsoft Developer" (which could mean just about anything.  Hell, you could be developing a new calculator for Windows for all I know.) but I do know that a computer science degree is a far cry from making you an expert on anything.  I recently switched jobs, and I didn't talk to ONE prospective employer in the Chicago area who gave a rat's ass about computer science degrees.  So, don't bother with the credentials, because I actually don't give a rat's ass either. 

What came out of PARC is the very reason why the myth still exists that Microsoft "stole" the Windows concept from Apple.  Both companies went to Xerox to look at the interface and both companies used it in their own way.  And in case you hadn't noticed, Vista looks nothing like OSX.  Yes, it has gadgets, but if it had that absolutely ridiculous software dock I would give up completely and switch to Linux.  The Unix system that Apples are based on is every bit as archaic as the kernel Windows is built on.  Fortunately, Microsoft is actively plugging holes and patching exploits while Apple is sitting there telling their users that Macs simply don't get viruses or malware.

Wow, I don't say this often, but your an idiot.

Most IT Professionals (witch could mean anything, hell, you could just be Tech support for AOL for all I know) will find UNIX operating systems superior to anything MS has produced in there lifetime. OSX is UNIX, forget about the UI, that alone, for all the reasons UNIX is better then Win32/64 OS's, is why it's better. Go look it up.

Thinking that people just buy apple products because they are uninformed is total bullshit. I used an Instinct for a few hours before I looked at the iPhone, and I can tell you 100%, the iPhone was the right choice.

With what you have said above, you can only be speaking from a position of ignorance, and arguing with someone unknowledgable is always an exercise in futility.

I am out of this thread.

 



Around the Network
Domicinator said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Domicinator said:

Any statement about Windows copying Mac OS is complete ignorance.  A research group at Xerox back in the 70's and 80's developed the windows type interface that BOTH operating systems use.  BOTH companies liked it and did their own take on it.  Apple made a cottage industry out of suing Microsoft back in the 80's claiming that Microsoft stole their Windows idea, when really they both took the idea from Xerox. And why is Vista

So the Zune is a copy of the iPod?  How about all the other MP3 players out there?  How about that Samsung Instinct?  Copy of the iPhone, right?  Are you honestly saying that the iPod is the only MP3 player that has a right to exist and that no other company should try to compete with it?  That's ridiculous.  There are jillions of other MP3 players out there that look like the iPod.  You only rip on MS because they're MS.  And for the record, the Zune is a better MP3 player than the iPod.

 

lol, you don't know me very well. I make my living as a Microsoft Developer, and have a CS degree. In order to get that, you need to take history of computing. I don't need to take history however to know about MS. I had a PC in 1980, and have owned every OS they have ever made. I have an MSDN license, and thus all MS software is available to me. I have evaluated, or utilized most of it.

MS does a lot of things well, very well. But there consumer offerings (not servers/dev tools) are all direct copies of competitors.

There is not enough time in the day to explain to you how OSX is better then Vista. Also comparing these OS's to what came out of Xerox PARC is ridiculous. Oh, and Steve Jobs asked Xerox if they could have the Alto 88's OS (and the mouse). Bill Gates then Stole the Mac design when Apple gave a prototype of the Mac to MS so they could write applications for it. If you think that's the same thing, you should be the last one throwing the word "ignorance" around.

And yes, the Instinct is a copy of the IPhone.

 

No, please, explain to me why OSX is better.  I'd love to know, because I think Mac OS is a steaming pile of crap.  And I think you misunderstand me, I know the Instinct is a copy of the iPhone, and there will be many more copies.  I'd venture to guess that most of them will be an improvement on the iPhone.  But since they won't have the little silver apple logo on them, they'll be considered garbage by people who don't know any better.  And that's what Apple's customer base is all about:  people who don't know any better.  People who fall for the most ridiculous advertising.  People who think that you can't burn a CD on anything but a Mac.

You don't know me very well either.  Please don't waste your breath on me by trying to convince me that Mac OS is better.  That's a ridiculous waste of time because it's all about personal preference.  Also, I'm in the IT business too.  I'm no "Microsoft Developer" (which could mean just about anything.  Hell, you could be developing a new calculator for Windows for all I know.) but I do know that a computer science degree is a far cry from making you an expert on anything.  I recently switched jobs, and I didn't talk to ONE prospective employer in the Chicago area who gave a rat's ass about computer science degrees.  So, don't bother with the credentials, because I actually don't give a rat's ass either. 

What came out of PARC is the very reason why the myth still exists that Microsoft "stole" the Windows concept from Apple.  Both companies went to Xerox to look at the interface and both companies used it in their own way.  And in case you hadn't noticed, Vista looks nothing like OSX.  Yes, it has gadgets, but if it had that absolutely ridiculous software dock I would give up completely and switch to Linux.  The Unix system that Apples are based on is every bit as archaic as the kernel Windows is built on.  Fortunately, Microsoft is actively plugging holes and patching exploits while Apple is sitting there telling their users that Macs simply don't get viruses or malware.

 

Lololol. You sure do hate apple and apple users, did someone with an apple-branded hat steal your candy when you were a kid?

I go back enough to remember setting up autoexec.bat and config.sys with different memory management schemes and I tell you mac osx works so much better than anything windows-related. Shit, I use vista at work... I can feel the difference everyday.

If you really need to think that apple users don't know better there's something wrong with you.

 





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).

JaggedSac said:
kjj4t9rdad said:
Vista = crap
Zune = crap
360 = crap
M$ can't do anything right. Why do people still buy there products?

 

I have a Zune(won it from Live Search Club) and it works great.  I download audio and video podcasts and listen to tons of music at work.  Not sure what problems people have with it.  The software is great also.

I own a 360 and so far I have had 1 rrod and am still incredibly happy with it and will gladly purchase M$'s next console.

 

yea i bought a zune and it is not a pice of crap way better than the ipod u get radio and wirless sync and the 360 isnt shitty if it dies u get a new one in a week it aint that bad it happened to me once and i got over it



TheRealMafoo said:
Domicinator said:

 

No, please, explain to me why OSX is better.  I'd love to know, because I think Mac OS is a steaming pile of crap.  And I think you misunderstand me, I know the Instinct is a copy of the iPhone, and there will be many more copies.  I'd venture to guess that most of them will be an improvement on the iPhone.  But since they won't have the little silver apple logo on them, they'll be considered garbage by people who don't know any better.  And that's what Apple's customer base is all about:  people who don't know any better.  People who fall for the most ridiculous advertising.  People who think that you can't burn a CD on anything but a Mac.

You don't know me very well either.  Please don't waste your breath on me by trying to convince me that Mac OS is better.  That's a ridiculous waste of time because it's all about personal preference.  Also, I'm in the IT business too.  I'm no "Microsoft Developer" (which could mean just about anything.  Hell, you could be developing a new calculator for Windows for all I know.) but I do know that a computer science degree is a far cry from making you an expert on anything.  I recently switched jobs, and I didn't talk to ONE prospective employer in the Chicago area who gave a rat's ass about computer science degrees.  So, don't bother with the credentials, because I actually don't give a rat's ass either. 

What came out of PARC is the very reason why the myth still exists that Microsoft "stole" the Windows concept from Apple.  Both companies went to Xerox to look at the interface and both companies used it in their own way.  And in case you hadn't noticed, Vista looks nothing like OSX.  Yes, it has gadgets, but if it had that absolutely ridiculous software dock I would give up completely and switch to Linux.  The Unix system that Apples are based on is every bit as archaic as the kernel Windows is built on.  Fortunately, Microsoft is actively plugging holes and patching exploits while Apple is sitting there telling their users that Macs simply don't get viruses or malware.

Wow, I don't say this often, but your an idiot.

Most IT Professionals (witch could mean anything, hell, you could just be Tech support for AOL for all I know) will find UNIX operating systems superior to anything MS has produced in there lifetime. OSX is UNIX, forget about the UI, that alone, for all the reasons UNIX is better then Win32/64 OS's, is why it's better. Go look it up.

Thinking that people just buy apple products because they are uninformed is total bullshit. I used an Instinct for a few hours before I looked at the iPhone, and I can tell you 100%, the iPhone was the right choice.

With what you have said above, you can only be speaking from a position of ignorance, and arguing with someone unknowledgable is always an exercise in futility.

I am out of this thread.

 

Go look up what?  That your opinion is right and mine is wrong?  Why the hell would I bother with that? 

I have no problem with UNIX itself.  I have a problem with OSX.  And the minute you tried to convince me that you were right because you had a computer science degree, I stopped taking anything you say seriously.  Nobody that knows anything about anything would actually claim that to be the reason, sorry.

 




kjj4t9rdad said:
Vista = crap
Zune = crap
360 = crap
M$ can't do anything right. Why do people still buy there products?

You forgot "Microsoft=crap".

I've never had anything Microsoft laid it's hands on make me too satisfied.

Windows XP is so terrible it makes me want to vomit because I have to use it, and I hear Vista is worse.

 

 



Domicinator said:

I have no problem with UNIX itself.  I have a problem with OSX. 

 

 

No, you have a problem with apple and its users who you just insulted using a blanket generalisation. That's when you lost all your credibility on this issue.





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).