windbane said:
gorgepir said: Anyway, it seems as a fruitless discussion, I just stated my opinion there, I didn't mean to troll. Somehow you misunderstood that for an attack on sony. It was just my opinion. it doesn't have to be right. |
Fair enough. I meant Rol more than you. The trend on vgchartz is: positive Sony post gets rampaged on. Apparently that extends to the Sony forum as well. |
Hey Windbane, you want to know why so many "pro sony" threads get antagonistic responses? Because people like you start spouting bulls*** that has little to no validity to make the ps3 look good at the expense of the other two consoles. . If you guys would just discuss the PS3 and not act as if its the best thing since sliced bread while the Wii is soooooooo last gen, non powerful, lame, weak, childish, pointless, etc..., people would probably not post negative responses to your threads. You make people antsy with your stupid comments about the wii all the time. Hell, half your posts in this thread have something bad to say about the wii.
Also, I don't think you have a firm grasp on how silly some of your statements are. The wii controller is a lot more complicated than you seem to think, with all your comments about old tech and cheap $10 dollar peripherals. Explain to me exactly how is Sony going to make a Wii like controller for the Ps2 that isn't expensive?
I suppose they could use the same components that are inside the wii remote, but are they also going to include a sensor bar? Since the Ps2 doesn't have a port to plug one in, I guess it'll have to be battery powered (which is ok I guess).
So they have the remote and the sensor bar...how does it talk to the ps2? Oh yeah, since the ps2 doesn't include bluetooth wireless, they'll have to include a wireless receptor thingy too. Now that they have all of that, how likely do you honestly think it is for them to have similar response rates? What sort of wireless would they use? Bluetooth? A possibility, but bluetooth receivers and transmitters aren't exactly dirt cheap.
Are they going to include a nunchuk attachment as well? If they don't, how are they going to give you an analog stick and enough buttons to play the games? If they include it, your talking about even more money.
My point is that soon enough you get a "peripheral" that is nearly the same price as the console itself! You can't just throw something together, sell it for $10 bucks with a packin game and call it a day, because even if you could build something for that cheap, which is unlikely, it'd probably suck ass.
The other option woudl be for them to come out with a version of the console specifically including all that stuff. I very highly doubt they'd do that considering it'd involve re-engineering parts of a console thats already 7 years old.
If you want people to take your arguments seriously, try thinking them through, instead of using them to insult the wii and promote Sony.
Ps, just because the Wii is running circles around the Ps3 doesn't mean you need to bash it so badly. Have a little respect, for this site, the forums and the users, on their choice of console. Be happy with your choice and respect those that chose the Wii or shut the hell up about people "trolling" your precious ps3 threads.