By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Malstrom rants about the hardcore - completely misses the point.

Picko said:
Squilliam said:

My Take

Based off a little web research and my own thoughts, hardcore; by my own definition is defined as an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average. It is not a definition of how well someone plays, but how someone goes about playing. The hardcore is always a minority by definition. Many people tend to use the word hardcore with the real intention of defining enthusiasts.

This is really all that needs to be said regarding what defines "hardcore" gamers. How it could be anything else is quite simply beyond me.

 

 

I guess basic definitions are beyond you.

enthusiast -

  1. One who is filled with enthusiasm; one who is ardently absorbed in an interest or pursuit: a baseball enthusiast.
  2. A zealot; a fanatic.

hardcore -

  1. The most dedicated, unfailingly loyal faction of a group or organization: the hard core of the separatist movement.
  2. An intractable core or nucleus of a society, especially one that is stubbornly resistant to improvement or change.

Now, do you think "an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average" is closer to "One who is filled with enthusiasm; one who is ardently absorbed in an interest or pursuit" or "An intractable core or nucleus of a society, especially one that is stubbornly resistant to improvement or change?"

See how his definition doesn't relate to the actual definition of hardcore at all?

 



Around the Network

"hardcore; by my own definition is defined as an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average (Perhaps I should add average of enthusiasts?)"

So therefore a hardcore gamer is just someone who pursues games or a game (singular) in an intense fashion. Cyber athletes would be the extreme high end of this definition in relation to gaming while someone who worked to cut their lap times in Mario Kart or played Fire Emblem with a high intensity of thought would also fall under this definition.

Buying a whole lot of games and using the hard setting on all of them does not.



Tease.

Squilliam said:
"hardcore; by my own definition is defined as an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average (Perhaps I should add average of enthusiasts?)"

So therefore a hardcore gamer is just someone who pursues games or a game (singular) in an intense fashion. Cyber athletes would be the extreme high end of this definition in relation to gaming while someone who worked to cut their lap times in Mario Kart or played Fire Emblem with a high intensity of thought would also fall under this definition.

Buying a whole lot of games and using the hard setting on all of them does not.

 

Your definition has nothing to do with the ACTUAL MEANING of the word.  You can't arbitrarily assign words new definitions.  That kind of kills the whole idea of communication.  What you did is tantamount to me saying "librarion; by my own definition is defined as a vicious killer who murders countless victims and sucks their blood."  Can I do that and then, using that definition, carry on a conversation with someone else?  No.  We'll be talking about two entirely different things.



tarheel91 said:
Picko said:
Squilliam said:

My Take

Based off a little web research and my own thoughts, hardcore; by my own definition is defined as an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average. It is not a definition of how well someone plays, but how someone goes about playing. The hardcore is always a minority by definition. Many people tend to use the word hardcore with the real intention of defining enthusiasts.

This is really all that needs to be said regarding what defines "hardcore" gamers. How it could be anything else is quite simply beyond me.

 

 

I guess basic definitions are beyond you.

enthusiast -

  1. One who is filled with enthusiasm; one who is ardently absorbed in an interest or pursuit: a baseball enthusiast.
  2. A zealot; a fanatic.

hardcore -

  1. The most dedicated, unfailingly loyal faction of a group or organization: the hard core of the separatist movement.
  2. An intractable core or nucleus of a society, especially one that is stubbornly resistant to improvement or change.

Now, do you think "an intensity of pursuit of any activity above and beyond what is typically average" is closer to "One who is filled with enthusiasm; one who is ardently absorbed in an interest or pursuit" or "An intractable core or nucleus of a society, especially one that is stubbornly resistant to improvement or change?"

See how his definition doesn't relate to the actual definition of hardcore at all?

 

Oh I see what you did there, you failed high school comprehension.

Clearly, his definition fulfills both (1) and (2) of the "enthusiast" and (1) of the "hardcore" definition. The intensity of a pursuit above normal levels is highly correlated to loyalty towards that said pursuit. It is probably also worth pointing that language is more a fluid concept than a stable one, definitions and language change and develop over time with words gaining new meanings. This is easily seen by the fact that dictionaries are regularly and routinely edited.

What you should've done is left out that first definition of "hardcore" and you might've got away with your silly post. But alas you just didn't think that far ahead ... maybe next time ...

 

 



 
Debating with fanboys, its not
all that dissimilar to banging ones
head against a wall 
colonelstubbs said:
starcraft said:
@ Squilliam

I know why you wrote this.

I know you got the reaction you wanted.

I know you got that reaction from who you wanted.

I love it.

Oh my im so intrigued....

Care to guess who it was........?

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

Around the Network
tarheel91 said:
famousringo said:
Million said:
Debating over something with no fixed definition is pointless.

 

I think Million's point has been pretty well established by now. Despite tarheel's best efforts to nail down the term, it's one of those words which gets tossed around so much that people just ascribe it whichever meaning suits their argument best.

That's exactly my point about why people are doing it wrong (I feel a strong urge to post a "You're doing it WRONG" picture here...).  In order to have any discussion the thing being discussed must be clearly defined.  People are arguing about what they think "hardcore" really means (aka what group they belong to and why their group should be considered hardcore).  If people would just reevaluate the group they describe and use adjectives whose definitions ACTUALLY DESCRIBE THE GROUP (I'm crazy, I know), then they'd realize that all but a select few like Malstrom aren't actually talking about the hardcore at all.  Most are talking about enthusiasts or technophiles or some other random groups.

I think the real issue is that hardcore has been labeled as cool and 1337 and zomgawesome, and people have self-confidence issues that make them feel like they need to belong to this zomgawesome group in order to be acceptable.  Thus, they simply take whatever they are and attempt to rationalize how this random group they belong to can somehow fit the word "hardcore" (even though it doesn't) so they can feel better about themselves.  If people would start trying to explain how they are zomgawesome instead of hardcore, then there would be much less of an issue.

 

Here you go.

 

I agree with you Tarheel.  It seems many people here like to pick and choose the meaning of words to fit their needs.

(Anyone remember this gem?: I guess it all depends on what your definition of "is" is.)



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

starcraft said:
colonelstubbs said:
starcraft said:
@ Squilliam

I know why you wrote this.

I know you got the reaction you wanted.

I know you got that reaction from who you wanted.

I love it.

Oh my im so intrigued....

Care to guess who it was........?

 

If it wasn't Sky Render then it wouldn't have been worth making this thread, right?

 



wfz said:
starcraft said:
colonelstubbs said:
starcraft said:
@ Squilliam

I know why you wrote this.

I know you got the reaction you wanted.

I know you got that reaction from who you wanted.

I love it.

Oh my im so intrigued....

Care to guess who it was........?

If it wasn't Sky Render then it wouldn't have been worth making this thread, right?

The win is strong with Reggie....

 



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

A lot of pointless discussion... about the definition of 'hardcore'.

The point that Malstrom missed in this article is the different motivations for people to play games. You may play to escape reality and to explore fantasies, or you may play to test your skills and overcome obstacles (like doing sports), and there's other motivations too, like winning (against human players in multiplayer).

Most 'hardcore' players to a degree play games like sports, and that's where (part of the) fun comes from. A game that requires much lower skills than you already have so you can play through without any effort is no fun for most people who seek a challenge.



bah, i would like them to prove it