1. I never make a hard prediction -notice I say probably
Now let's take 5,460,000 million that the 360 has as a lead over the PS3 for LTD and divide it by 41289.
5,460,000/41289 = 132 weeks. 30 months. 2.5 years. If the PS3 keeps this average.
I don't think the PS3 will keep this average through January, because of the 360 price cut and how attractive it becomes as a gift for the kids. So I will extend that to 2.75 years.
Read that carefully, I never say 2.5 or 2.75 is my prediction. I say "If the PS3 keeps this average." Then, I go into a likely scenario for this holiday. 360 price cut, PS3 shortages (not mentioned). I don't see why this is offensive.
For Sony to "catch up" in:
- 18 months it would take 75k per week.
- 24 months it would take 57k per week.
- 12 months it would take 113k per week.
Above this, I broked down time by sales. In this part I provide it from the other direction, sales by time.
So IF it happens it probably won't until 2-3 years away.
This is where I make my soft prediction. I think it is reasonable to believe that the PS3 won't be outselling the 360 by 60k per week. But, that doesn't necessarily make it unreasonable to believe otherwise, it is not an attack.
Will it matter?
2. It okay to say: "I don't agree, because of this, this, or this". It is not okay to call my numbers garbage or get outraged and accuse me of insulting a console. Consoles don't have feelings. (Except for my Dreamcast, her name is Cassie and she is Dreamy. She is also very sensitive.)
3. Past numbers aren't being used to predict in my assumption. I used them to show trends. I think that the PS3 will continue to outsell the 360 at about the same because both consoles will have "weapons" in their "arsenal". I don't think $199 trumps Bluray or that LBP will crush Gears 2. They are all valid marketing tools under their own merits, and I think they just about level the field, when talking rate of change.
4. I am not saying that the rate will remain the same on a weekly basis for any of the analysis
- 18 months it would take 75k per week.
- 24 months it would take 57k per week.
- 12 months it would take 113k per week.
This means, for the PS3 to catch the 360 it would take an average of that many per week. Those numbers aren't predictions they are math.
5,460,000/(months*4)= amount.
Are people really this bad at understanding math? It's just averages, not my opinions.
5. I don't see how my opinion can be taken as leaning against the PS3, I am predicting that the PS3 will out sell the 360 by forty thousand units per week.