By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Perry: "Sony has no chance of making money on the PS3"

bbsin said:
HappySqurriel said:
Jason77 said:
Sony making their money base on the sell of blu-ray disk and home entertainment system. PS3 is just a step stone.

 

I just want to know why everyone thinks "Blu-Ray" is some sort of super money maker for Sony?

Of all costs associated with Blu-Ray players and discs, the licencing fees on most formats have never been that large of a portion of the total costs; and there are hundreds of companies who get a cut for this due to their involvement with the Blu-Ray consortium, or the technology that is licenced to produce the Blu-Ray format. On top of this, Sony and other companies have had fairly large expenses in order to make Blu-Ray as successful as it currently is ... The hundreds of millions of dollars that were paid in order to get studios to become Blu-Ray exclusive mainly came out of the pocket of a couple of companies (including Sony).

 


The reason companies like Sony push formats like Blu-Ray has nothing to do with the money they make (directly) from Blu-Ray. The reason they push it is because a new format provides a need for new hardware (like Televisions and surround sound systems), and encourages people to re-buy the same movies they already own ...

 

Wrong, there are alot of companies that get tiny returns on bluray profitability but here are 18 companies that can really profit alot directly from sales of BluRay technology. Sony gets by far the most being that they championed the product. The actual forecast for BluRay DVD sales alone for next year are in the billions (maybe 2-3) and will multiply dramatically years down the road if the format stays on track. With that being said, Sony gets roughly 25-30% of that pie... While BluRay can be used as a horse to sell high def displays and audio, the bulk of the profits will come from royalties off disk sales.

 

Lets make an assumption that 10% of all Blu-Ray revenue ends up being absorbed as licencing fees, and Sony makes 25% of that (which are both amazingly optimistic numbers); this means that when Blu-Ray has generated $200 Billion in revenue then Sony will have broken even on the PS3 ... How likely is it that the format will sell over 500 Million players (at their current cost) or 6 Billion movies (at their current cost)?



Around the Network
HappySqurriel said:
bbsin said:
HappySqurriel said:
Jason77 said:
Sony making their money base on the sell of blu-ray disk and home entertainment system. PS3 is just a step stone.

 

I just want to know why everyone thinks "Blu-Ray" is some sort of super money maker for Sony?

Of all costs associated with Blu-Ray players and discs, the licencing fees on most formats have never been that large of a portion of the total costs; and there are hundreds of companies who get a cut for this due to their involvement with the Blu-Ray consortium, or the technology that is licenced to produce the Blu-Ray format. On top of this, Sony and other companies have had fairly large expenses in order to make Blu-Ray as successful as it currently is ... The hundreds of millions of dollars that were paid in order to get studios to become Blu-Ray exclusive mainly came out of the pocket of a couple of companies (including Sony).

 


The reason companies like Sony push formats like Blu-Ray has nothing to do with the money they make (directly) from Blu-Ray. The reason they push it is because a new format provides a need for new hardware (like Televisions and surround sound systems), and encourages people to re-buy the same movies they already own ...

 

Wrong, there are alot of companies that get tiny returns on bluray profitability but here are 18 companies that can really profit alot directly from sales of BluRay technology. Sony gets by far the most being that they championed the product. The actual forecast for BluRay DVD sales alone for next year are in the billions (maybe 2-3) and will multiply dramatically years down the road if the format stays on track. With that being said, Sony gets roughly 25-30% of that pie... While BluRay can be used as a horse to sell high def displays and audio, the bulk of the profits will come from royalties off disk sales.

 

Lets make an assumption that 10% of all Blu-Ray revenue ends up being absorbed as licencing fees, and Sony makes 25% of that (which are both amazingly optimistic numbers); this means that when Blu-Ray has generated $200 Billion in revenue then Sony will have broken even on the PS3 ... How likely is it that the format will sell over 500 Million players (at their current cost) or 6 Billion movies (at their current cost)?

25% is not optimistic at all, I'd imagine Sony would have 30%.

Anyways, I'm not getting your math here. You're saying that:

200b - 20b = 180 * .25 = 45billion = not enough to brake even on the PS3?

If things go good for BluRay, many studios predict 30billion dollars of revenue by 2010. A good chunk of those movie sales will come from Sony/Columbia pictures. And SCEI would be getting money their own way by reducing hardware costs and sales royalties. That would equate to around 6-7 billion dollars to Sony (if I went by your formula) without adding anything but BluRay players and disks (discluding videos games). Also, 2010 isn't even expected to be near the apex of the format's life.



bbsin said:

25% is not optimistic at all, I'd imagine Sony would have 30%.

Anyways, I'm not getting your math here. You're saying that:

200b - 20b = 180 * .25 = 45billion = not enough to brake even on the PS3?

If things go good for BluRay, many studios predict 30billion dollars of revenue by 2010. A good chunk of those movie sales will come from Sony/Columbia pictures. And SCEI would be getting money thier own way by reducing hardware costs and sales royalties. That would equate to around 6-7 billion dollars to Sony (if I went by your formula) without adding anything but disk sales.

 

No, your math is screwed ...

$200 Billion = Gross Revenue
$20 Billion = Licencing Revenue
$5 Billion = Sony's cut of licencing revenue

Now ... The 10% is amazingly optimistic because most formats (in particular new formats) have very large margins at retail to encourage stores to stock the discs (we're talking in the 100% mark up range), and companies eventually can find a way to sell movies and make a profit at a very low price ($5).

The 25% take home off of licencing fees is amazingly optimistic because as a licencee you gain the rights to use all of the technologies that are licenced by the Blu-Ray consortium to make the Blu-Ray format. If you look at the Blu-Ray specifications there are hundreds of patents that are owned by various companies who each get a cut of the Blu-Ray licencing fee. On top of that there are dozens of companies who are also heavily involved with promoting the Blu-Ray format who are (likely) going to get a cut of the fees.



lol @ happy

Sony is fine blu-ray will make billions
lol@ anyone who thinks other wise lol.

Remeber M$ lost 4 billion on the 1st xbox and ps3 has only lost 3 billion and its safe to say ps3 will sell more games and systems then the 1st xbox so everyone is fine.



they may make up the losses on the blu ray thing



 nintendo fanboy, but the good kind

proud soldier of nintopia

 

Around the Network
Dno said:
lol @ happy

Sony is fine blu-ray will make billions
lol@ anyone who thinks other wise lol.

Remeber M$ lost 4 billion on the 1st xbox and ps3 has only lost 3 billion and its safe to say ps3 will sell more games and systems then the 1st xbox so everyone is fine.

Please explain HOW Sony will make $5+ Billion from Blu-Ray!

Don't forget that retailers need to make money, movie studios need to make money, hardware manufacturers need to make money, the partners on the Blu-Ray formate need to make money, and the firms that Blu-Ray licenced technology from need to make money.

 



Seihyouken said:
TWRoO said:
Seihyouken said:
Sony will definitely not make the same amount of money off the PS3 that they did with the PS2, but it's pretty foolish to think that they won't at least break even, especially if they delay the PS4 until 2013 or so.

Consider the following:

Sony made about $50,000,000 last quarter despite the huge amount of PS3s sold at Sony's loss.

The new 80GB and 160GB PS3s about to be released are almost definitely profitable. If true, that means that the only things that will be dragging Sony's profits down would be game/software development and upkeep as well as future price cuts.

Like I said above... that depends entirely on what you look at.

If you are talking the PS division as a whole, and the timeframe from PS3 launch to PS4 launch, then yes I believe they should make an overall profit (currently $3billion down though)

If you are seperating the PS3 from the rest, then I am pretty sure it will not manage it, as it must have lost at least 5 billion already, and is still losing money

 

 

You're correct, sir. Natrually, PS3 will not recoup the cost of its own development or sales at a loss on it's own, but I don't think Sony ever counted on it doing so. However, as long the PlayStation division as a whole stays profitable then it doesn't really matter if one system doesn't make a profit because most of the money put forth to develop new technology in any current system will be used in future systems. It's all one big investment to continue and drive forward the game industry.

the only post in the three pages that I agree with.  it doesn't matter if the ps3 doesn't make back the money it lost (though Sony would love it if it did).  If the division makes money from continuing sales of the ps2, psp, and games from all three systems, that is what matters.  Obviously Sony is looking at the billions Nintendo is making by selling two systems at a profit and will want to copy that.  Especially when it doesn't take much more than they have right now to easily have all games in 720p and a good number of games in 1080p.  And think of the billions Sony would make if they fix the piracy problem on the psp2, sell it at a profit along with its games, sell the ps3 at a profit at the end of its life plus its games, and decide to follow Nintendo's path and sell the ps4 at a profit along with its games.



DeotoxSlayer said:
AnarchyWest said:
DMeisterJ said:
The_vagabond7 said:
Seeing as how Sony has lost more money on the PS3 than they made on the PS1 and PS2 combined, I would have to agree with that. It will some day "make money" but not anywhere close to the extent that it lost money.

Errr... no.

The PS3 has lost the amount of money that they made during the PS2 era, give or take a few million.

It hasn't lost PS1 money yet.

I can't find the thread, but they've *only* lost 3.2 billion (Sounds so weird using only and 3.2 billion in one sentence) on the PS3, and they made almost that during the PS2 era.

The 2 billion or so the PS1 made is still here.

is this what your looking for ?

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=111003

 

 

 

 Microsoft Lost $6,369,000,000 off of their gaimng division? Damn that's even worse then I though.

If Sony has no chance of making trhe PS3 break even, then doesn't that also mean that the Microsoft gaming Division will never turn a profit.

Thats not correct MS dosent have a gaming division its an entertainment division and it includes more the the Xbox it includes Zune so we dont know exactly what the MS loss on the Xbox is.  I will agree though its significant

But for them its an investment they new they would lose money being a new entry into the gaming sector and its starting to pay off as they finally make money. 

Sony made tons on PS1 and PS2 then took a bath on the PS3 they are heading in the wrong direction.

 

 

 

 

 



PS3, WII and 360 all great systems depends on what type of console player you are.

Currently playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Halo ODST and Dragon Age Origins is next game

Xbox live:mywiferocks

Dno said:
lol @ happy

Sony is fine blu-ray will make billions
lol@ anyone who thinks other wise lol.

Remeber M$ lost 4 billion on the 1st xbox and ps3 has only lost 3 billion and its safe to say ps3 will sell more games and systems then the 1st xbox so everyone is fine.

 

What we should be talking about is both MS and Sony are or were losing money and Nintendo has been making money day one.  I think next console we may see a shift stratergy as the console may no longer be a loss leader and they may want to at worse break even on console sales.  Stinks for me personally but it may happen



PS3, WII and 360 all great systems depends on what type of console player you are.

Currently playing Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2, Fallout 3, Halo ODST and Dragon Age Origins is next game

Xbox live:mywiferocks

first post in this silly little argument,
sony will make it's money back
the ps3 was strategically designed to win the HD movement.
It has done that, and eventually it will be accepted as the dominant format>dvd.
step one: success
step two( make the console profitable): in progress
in war there are primary objectives, and secondary objectives.
Now while, to gamers, it was a little bit of a slap in the face that the primary objective hampered our own desire for sony-era style games, a lot of us are happy to have cutting edge tech and be on the ground level of it all.
the secondary objective is just like it sounds, but as of 10 months ago, primary objective was complete and they have been putting everything they can into the console development.
From the game releases and announcements, and updates and SKU upgrades, things appear to be looking up.
they will continue to upgrade and make the entire package better until the time comes when they feel the console has ripened.