By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Sony is the most innovative game producer

S.T.A.G.E. on 20 August 2008
solideffect said:
sony has been taking alot of chances the past year
most of the games they are really pushing are kinda new and interesting
LBP, Flower, DCU online
now if they can stop hyping shooters they could continue this path

Chances?...please dude, they want to reach the casual market. Games like Flower are aimed at the casual.

 



Around the Network
HappySqurriel on 20 August 2008

I don't really believe that innovation is a quality that is (really) an inherent quality of a company ... Most companies end up having cycles where they're more or less innovative which is primarily driven by their (expected) needs in the market.

If you're fully expecting third party publishers to fulfill the known needs and desires of existing consumers you expect that people will be looking for far more unique software experiences, and you're far more likely to greenlight any unusual project.



DirtyP2002 on 20 August 2008
stanley2011 said:

http://neocrisis.com/content/view/1886/134/

Sony is the most innovated game producer for PSN, PSP and PS3 games. It first started with the release of Locoroco. The game was praised for its music and simple platforming gameplay. Then came Patapon, which was praised for its mix of wonderful art, music and action. At E3, it was announced that there will be squels to both of the games.

(not by me)

 

 am I the only one who smiled right there?



Imagine not having GamePass on your console...

deathcape on 20 August 2008

lol...that post made me laugh ^_^
doesn't that mean anyone who makes games that sell well is an innovator?

I mean..there have been games like that made by nintendo BEFORE they came out on a sony platform....


someone is trying to prove they suck at history again...



The Truth About Nintendo

The truth about Hardcore and Casual

Kasz216 on 20 August 2008
d21lewis said:
That's good. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo SHOULD be the best/most innovative developers of their respective consoles.

Yeah... i mean they do know the hardware best...

What funny is that nobody read the actual OP... and are now apparently argueing that MS and Nintendo are more or less innovative on Sony consoles.

 

 



Around the Network
Gnizmo on 20 August 2008
Kasz216 said:
d21lewis said:
That's good. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo SHOULD be the best/most innovative developers of their respective consoles.

Yeah... i mean they do know the hardware best...

What funny is that nobody read the actual OP... and are now apparently argueing that MS and Nintendo are more or less innovative on Sony consoles.

 

 

 I can see a case being made for Microsoft indirectly being a big innovator on the console. The online services offered via the PSN are clearly being modeled after Xbox Live. You qould have to put forth online services as the premier part of the console (as opposed to games) though and I don't think anyone would argue that.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

pbroy on 20 August 2008
d21lewis said:
That's good. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo SHOULD be the best/most innovative developers of their respective consoles.

 

If I made the console and some other company made a better game than I did on my own console, I would be ashamed.

But I think Sega was the most innovative on their own console. VF2 on Saturn, that was the WTF momment in gaming history for me. How the fuck can you make a game so good on this piece of crap Saturn that is supposed to not be able to do good 3D?

Dreamcast failed in that aspect. Namco made the most innovative game on the Dreamcast. Soul Calibur was so good, no other game came close to matching it on that system. It was a freaken launch title too.

VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER
Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence
HappySqurriel on 20 August 2008
pbroy said:
d21lewis said:
That's good. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo SHOULD be the best/most innovative developers of their respective consoles.

 

If I made the console and some other company made a better game than I did on my own console, I would be ashamed.

But I think Sega was the most innovative on their own console. VF2 on Saturn, that was the WTF momment in gaming history for me. How the fuck can you make a game so good on this piece of crap Saturn that is supposed to not be able to do good 3D?

Dreamcast failed in that aspect. Namco made the most innovative game on the Dreamcast. Soul Calibur was so good, no other game came close to matching it on that system. It was a freaken launch title too.

Why? Would it be better if they made this better game on your competition's console?

 

 



SaviorX on 20 August 2008

*poofffffh*

That's me spitting out my drink.



Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. "  thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."

pbroy on 20 August 2008
HappySqurriel said:
pbroy said:
d21lewis said:
That's good. Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo SHOULD be the best/most innovative developers of their respective consoles.

 

If I made the console and some other company made a better game than I did on my own console, I would be ashamed.

But I think Sega was the most innovative on their own console. VF2 on Saturn, that was the WTF momment in gaming history for me. How the fuck can you make a game so good on this piece of crap Saturn that is supposed to not be able to do good 3D?

Dreamcast failed in that aspect. Namco made the most innovative game on the Dreamcast. Soul Calibur was so good, no other game came close to matching it on that system. It was a freaken launch title too.

Why? Would it be better if they made this better game on your competition's console?

 

 

 

No, it's the fact that a 3rd party developer can make better games on a system compared to a 1st party developer is shameful.

VGChartz♥♥♥♥♥FOREVER
Xbone... the new "N" word   Apparently I troll MS now | Evidence | Evidence