Unless You're Nintendo, Game Consoles Are Expensive
At the Games Convention Developers Dave Perry from Earthworm Jim developer Shiny Entertainment stated that Sony lost more money selling PS3 at a loss than it made during the five years of PlayStation 2 peak sales. That figure is estimated as being in the US$3 billion ballpark. The data that Perry cited came from DFC Intelligence. Not taking a stance on the "console war", Perry was using this data to point out how much of an investment Sony was putting in the PS3.
Microsoft also has lost a lot of money on the Xbox 360 -- that Red Ring of Death clusterfuck cost the company a billion dollars. Microsoft lost $4 billion on the original Xbox, and Sony, of course, was in the red with the PS2 for the first few years it launched. Seems like only Nintendo has this making-money-on-game-consoles schtick down.
Sony Has Lost More on the PS3 Than it Made on PS2 [1up via The Escapist]
Okay, didn't know Sony lost more on the PS3 than they gained on the PS2, but this is still practically old news. I'm only posting it because Kotaku failed to point out how this was so obvious.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs














