disolitude said:
cwbys21 said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Yes another unassuming consumer completely convinced that lesser systems are completely obsolete in the path of the monumental blu-ray format and the power of the cell processing cpu unit 9000.
Glory be to an Internet that spawns such avid consumer advocates. Those which give nothing short of pure, righteous indignant opinions on subjects of consumer electronics, without a hint of the ever-growing cloud of bias surrounding the entheusiasts press and supplicant commentators.
You are absolutely right, the Sony consoles are the only worthy players in the medium of interactive video-gaming. No one, knowing all the facts, would jip themselves by purchasing a Wii or a 360, when the PS3 is such a moderately priced piece of future-proof masculinity. It boggles the mind how Sony can afford to sell it for under a thousands United States Dollars.
TC, to me, you are a hero of the Internet, and I salute you. Your posting history, to me, reads like Robert Frost.
|
And your posting history to me reads like something I can't mention or else I would get banned for insulting people again. Seriously, have you ever posted anything positive about Sony? or in a Sony thread? even though I can't remember if you ever have, you always show up saying anti Sony stuff or insulting pro Sony people (there is a difference between a pro Sony person and a Sony fanboy btw). Your history with all the bans tells me that the mods might agree with me a bit.
|
Yes there is a difference between a fan and a trolling fanboy and if you think this thread doesn't lean quite heavily on the fanboy side...you may want to re-examine your definition of each.
|
I've always wondered, how DO you avoid being called a fanboy? Is owning all systems in question from release, playing (and owning) at least 10 games for each system (the best exclusives) and judging their merits not sufficient? I used all three systems, owned them all for over a year and found two out of three lacking for different reasons. The Wii I would consider rebuying if something changes next year, I sold it for lack of near future prospects not lack of prospects for all time (why hold on to something if you're not going to use it for the next year?) but the 360 I have been roundly disapointed by over and over. Yes I bought an Xbox too and played its best games when it was heavily discounted on the runup to the 360. If you play all of a consoles best games (including Halo 3, Gears of War, Viva Pinata ect) and try everything that suposedly makes it better and find it worse how does that make you horridly biased?
I tried both and the PS3 is better then the 360 in every single way from better exclusives to better graphics in exclusive games to great free online to Blu ray playback to network capacity to playing divx movies from the hard drive ect ect. If something IS better in every way and you say so after trying both you are a impartial person who makes a choice between two options. How does choosing the PS3 as my vastly superior option make me some blind fanboy?
I like the PS3 most because it is the best console in features I want (I want a quality HD device), I would have no qualms about switching if it was otherwise. I switched from Nintendo exclusive to Sony in the N64 generation when the N64 couldn't handle the games I wanted to play (notably FFVII) and would switch from Sony if they were not the best option. They ARE the best option however for at least the rest of this generation unless you can give me a single 360 feature (and don't use games I can also play on my gaming PC) that is superior to the PS3. I can think of 20 PS3 features that are superior to the 360 off the top of my head from using both.