By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Best Zelda timeline explanation?

I personally think:

MC> FS> OoT (child)> MM> TP> FSA> ALttP> OoA/OoS> LA
MC> FS> OoT (adult)> WW> PH

I dunno where to put the old Zelda games... Perhaps after PH... *Shrugs*



Around the Network
mariozeldametroid said:
Oyvoyvoyv said:
deathcape said:
what the hell is that timeline nutboy?...

that's crap...you do know that there are a total of two possible started Zledas

Ocarina of Time or Minish Cap..

 

 It's the chronological timeline. It was a genious to put that in here really.

 

The real timeline is as follows: Wind Waker - Phantom Hourglass - lacking game - the Minish Cap - Ocarina of Time - Link's awakening - Legend of Zelda - Adventure of Link - Four Swords - Link to the Past - Oracle of Ages - lacking game - Twilight Princess - continues from here

 

The first lacking game involves draining Hyrule, and re-building it.

In the second lacking game, Link re-creates the mirror of shadows, and tries to travel through it. Unfortunately, it doesn't work as expected. Link eventually ends up in The temple of Time, to see that it is once again grandly threatned. Link saves it, and Twilight Princess follows.

 

It's all very simple.

 

You're wrong. The timeline is split, this was confirmed by Aonuma in an interview.

I COULD post some of my timelines here, but I'm not in the mood.

 

Wait, you actually took that seriously?

 



http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261

That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS

I like to think about it like this. Zelda has many ages.

Age 1: Zelda Fables: These stories occur before OoT when the Hero of Time came in.

Minish Cap - precursor to the Master Sword with the Picori Sword
Four Sword/Four Sword Adventure - Evolve the Vaati Plot
Oracle Games

Age 2: Hero of Time Stories.
Starts with OoT and the Timeline Splits.
The Child story goes like this:
After coming back thru time and realizing that his battle against Gannondorf will be intense, Link decides to travel to sharpen his stuff. Hence many adventures. First he travels to Termina (MM), and then gets shiped wrecked (LA), then he awakens a sleeping beauty that was placed under a curse (LoZ2:AoL). Then, when Ganondorf finally makes his move to over take Hyrule, Link fairly easily dispatches him (LoZ) and replaces the Master Sword to it's resting place. But that's when things go wrong. He defeats the current male of the Gerudo, but a nemesis from a previous adventure, Aganhim seemingly allies with the King of Hyrule. However, Aganhim truly wants to break the seal of the Dark/Golden Land and release a former male of the Gerudo, the one that made it to the triforce and had Vaati's trident (Alttp). Link defeats him and seals him back into the darkness.

The Adult Story goes like this:
It ends with OoT. Link is sent back and Ganondorf is sealed until the next age.

Age 3: Return and Final(hopefully) Defeat of Ganon:
Child: Ganondorf (older) corrupts the leader of the inhabitants to the Dark/Twilight world. The seals is broken and the descendent of the Hero of Time is called to duty (TP).
Adult: Ganondorf (younger) breaks out of his seal in an age when hyrule has completely changed. A new Hero of Time is awakened (WW and PH).

I know, it's a stretch, but I like it.



_____________________________________________________

Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com

Onyxmeth said:
Nutboy said:

 

 

Bravo! You got it right! And here we all were shaking our heads in confusion.

 

This is just when all the games were released, they are talking about the order of events in the series.

 



www.tranmererovers.co.uk

Currently playing: Legend of Zelda: Spirit Tracks and Red Steel.

Wii Friend Codes:

Smash Bros Brawl- 5284 2865 3565

Mario Kart Wii- 0216 0932 4306

Mario Strikers Charged- 034471 707985

Send me a message if you have added me.

The best Zelda timeline explanation is that there is none. It is a series about a legend, and like all legends there are many versions of the same basic story. Games that don't explicitly draw connections to one another should not be considered part of the same version.

I think it would be neat if the last game in the series (assuming there ever IS a last game in the series) established itself as the true history behind the legend: what really happened.



Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.

Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.

What do I hate about modern gaming? I hate tedium replacing challenge, complexity replacing depth, and domination replacing entertainment. I hate the outsourcing of mechanics to physics textbooks, art direction to photocopiers, and story to cheap Hollywood screenwriters. I hate the confusion of obsession with dedication, style with substance, new with gimmicky, old with obsolete, new with evolutionary, and old with time-tested.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.

Around the Network
SuperSteveyLes said:
Onyxmeth said:
Nutboy said:

 

 

Bravo! You got it right! And here we all were shaking our heads in confusion.

 

This is just when all the games were released, they are talking about the order of events in the series.

 

 



_____________________________________________________

Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com