if it was not for sony and the ps3 blu ray would be another betamax so i guess it is only fair that it has the most attention drawn to it out of the other blu-ray players
What? They are in discs (as the article said), so by logic, you already have a BD player, before you are buying the disc.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
Well I believe they were a big part in the creation of blu-ray, R&D wise anyway. Not surprising to me :) The PS3 took major hits on the market to get the format up and running, the industry probably knows this :P
From 0 to KICKASS in .stupid seconds.
no t really.
but if they want to compete.
they better release HDD powerd blu ray players at a sub 200$ price.
that will likely happen soon.
obieslut said: if it was not for sony and the ps3 blu ray would be another betamax so i guess it is only fair that it has the most attention drawn to it out of the other blu-ray players |
I'd say Laserdisc not Betamax.
Difference being Betamax had a pretty good following of techno and cinemafiles backing it until the new format (DVD) came out.
Blu-ray woulda ended up the same way (still has a chance of it.)
ChronotriggerJM said: Well I believe they were a big part in the creation of blu-ray, R&D wise anyway. Not surprising to me :) The PS3 took major hits on the market to get the format up and running, the industry probably knows this :P |
They hold the most of the blu-ray IP... at like 30% so yeah i'd say they probably had a big part in creation.
Kasz216 said:
They hold the most of the blu-ray IP... at like 30% so yeah i'd say they probably had a big part in creation.
|
Matsushita (Panasonic) actually holds more patents in Blu-Ray tech than Sony, iirc.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.