| reptile168 said:
Motion blur, exactly what all PS3 games have compared to their 360 counterpart.
|
Mmmm, never heard of that. Any sources?
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
| reptile168 said:
Motion blur, exactly what all PS3 games have compared to their 360 counterpart.
|
Mmmm, never heard of that. Any sources?
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
In my opinion, Gears of War 2 looks better. A notable difference from the first one.
Pixel Art can be fun.
NJ5 said:
I can definitely tell when there's slowdown and it drops. And in some genres, I can tell if it's 30 fps or 60 fps (although some clever tricks like motion blur can make 30 fps look much better; incidentally, the same reason why movies are fine at just 24 fps).
|
Yeah :D we can all tell when theres a sustantial frame rate drop...it saddly happens allot this gen ><
but i'm just saying that as long as it runs well/looks good in 30FPS, why complain?
@MakoInfused: That's exactly what I was saying too. (although 60 fps would be preferable... but this is a shooter so it's not that bad)
My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957
BrayanA said:
I will go with this! IGN > 1000 PS3 fanboys opinions
|
Hell man take a look at gametrailers i think a lot more people pay attention to them over ign because theyre on tv
Gametrailers > IGN > 1000 PS3 fanboys
Maybe this is just me (and I'm not a MS fanboy, the only next gen console I have is a Wii), but isn't the fact that you can debate this at all a decisive win for GoW2?
I mean, KZ2 was first revealed at E3 '05. That's before the 360 even came out. If it releases in early '09 like it's supposed to, that's a 3.5 year development cycle at least. GoW2 is slated to release exactly 2 years after GoW1. I would rather have 2 fun games rather than 1 fun game with slightly improved graphics.
Wii has more 20 million sellers than PS3 has 5 million sellers.
Acolyte of Disruption
| Insanestalker2 said: Does Gears 2 have deferred rendering or lens flare? |
I'm sure it has lens flare, but it doesn't have defferred rendering, however; but all defferred rendering means is that the engine won't render non-visible polygon fragments, which reduces the amount of fill required to draw the on screen image... actually all 3d dreamcast games used defferred rendering,
anyway if gears really runs at 60, which I doubt, it'd look absolutely incredible, and really blow away killzone and every other game on console, but both seem to run at 30 so I'll stand by Gears looking better anyway
I HAVE A DOUBLE DRAGON CAB IN MY KITCHEN!!!!!!
NOW A PUNISHER CAB!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone's saying KZ. Baffles me :3
Can someone show me why it looks so impressive? (a video maybe...)
Cos I'm just not seeing it. Maybe there's just too many ps3 fanboys here.

| --OkeyDokey-- said: Everyone's saying KZ. Baffles me :3 Can someone show me why it looks so impressive? (a video maybe...) Cos I'm just not seeing it. Maybe there's just too many ps3 fanboys here. |
This is a pretty good video. Its 720p and 8min longs, the full download is over 500mb, but the HQ stream looks pretty good too.
http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_8142_en.html
masschamber said:
I'm sure it has lens flare, but it doesn't have defferred rendering, however; but all defferred rendering means is that the engine won't render non-visible polygon fragments, which reduces the amount of fill required to draw the on screen image... actually all 3d dreamcast games used defferred rendering,
anyway if gears really runs at 60, which I doubt, it'd look absolutely incredible, and really blow away killzone and every other game on console, but both seem to run at 30 so I'll stand by Gears looking better anyway
|
They shouldn't even be compared. Gears is a 3rd person shooter and Killzone is 1st person shooter. I love how gears shows you a perfect view of your character but you get a huge vast distance view. It's beautiful.