gorgepir said:
redspear said:
Kwaad:
Oh yeah post a picture from a fake CGI tailer as in game graphics.
SSJ12: Are you running Vista 64 otherwise you wasted your money on 8 Gigs of ram as vista 32 cannot recognize 8gigs of RAM or even 4 gigs of RAM because of bios memory and video card memory and since you claim to have 2 8800 graphics card running in SLI that is at least 750 megs of memory or 1.5 gigs of memory there meaning your computer can only recognize 3.25 gigs - BIOS memory - Virtual memory(if you haven't turned it off which you should) but is on average 750MB)=roughly anywhere from 3.2GB to 2.75 GB of physical RAM. IF you stated that you were running Windows 2003 enterprise edition I might believe you. However owning a vista machine with over 4 GB of memory I know you are lieing or that you wasted your money on unused memory. While OS X can recognize more than 4 gigs you said vista. You also managed to OC a Xeon faster than it has ever been OC before and I have not read about that on an Overclocker board BTW why not get a 7140n. So either you are a god of a modder or a liar and miracilously do not promote your work. Before you jump on me I know the QX6700 is a core 2 but I have not seen evidence of that core being pushed passed 4.2 gigs. So if you got it to 5.7 what voltage did you use? |
why would anyone get a vista 32? It seam like a strange question to ask. The why I see it, the real enhancement of vista over xp was the whole jump to 64 |
Vista 64 has some major compatibility problems especially if you want to do any type of video editing or DVD-mastering. there are also driver issues with it as well.
Entroper. hehe yeah I missed that. I was fiarly drunk when I posted thet.