Lol yes very...

Only the most rabid Nintendo fanboys would dare to try and belittle something as innovative as this.

I would if hadn´t to pay $700 to play it...
It still is cool though

It is cool...I will never buy it though...it's just too much money.

 1. I belitte everything.

 2. Yes it´s cool anything that brings the world closer to Star Wars is very cool.

 3. Lets see it in action before we wet ourselfs.

Does for an instance Wii-sport's tennis play any different to a standard tennis?... LOL.

^^ I´ve played cards with three buddies in my livingroom on a rainy day, can´t say the same about tennis :)

Oh and......whait for it.........BURN !!!

We have seen it in action. At GDC:

Part 1: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/19613.html

Part 2: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/19649.html

Part 3: http://www.gametrailers.com/player/19682.html

But this video is a lot cooler:

http://www.gamespot.com/video/930092/6169930/the-eye-of-judgment-working-title-interview

And I definitely wet myself after seeing it in action. I normally don't play card games, but I really find this game cool and interesting and the tech seems just crazy to me. 

 Actually the difference between real tennis and Wii Sports is a lot bigger than the difference between this and a card game. That's a good thing for the Eye of Judgment though as this is actually cooler than a card game, while Wii Sports is definitely not as cool as if you were good at actually playing tennis.

well ok it does look pretty good in action, looks like a mix of Magic and chess, what bothers me is just like with magic and other trading card games is that it will cost you to get a good deck and then after a half a year or so a new set is released and you have to buy new cards to compete, the game looks really fun to me but it would be more fun if everyone could use all the cards, I hate losing just because another player has newer, more expensive cards, I think it would be more fun (and it would be harder to cheat via internet) if you had a virtual card deck, but then you wouldent really need the camera, thats just my opinion, I have about 400 $ worth of magic cards and I´m happy to have them, but my days of paying money for paper cards are over, plus I can´t even magic play with most people because they have newer cards, if I wanted to play magic with new players I would have to pay for new cards, or I could find that old magic pc game I have somewhere, that was fun :)

in other news: I hate real tennis but love Wii tennis so yes it´s a big difference, we don´t have the time or motivation to really be good at tennis, real tennis is really hard, Wii tennis I can play against anyone and even if they never played, after a game or two they can beat me (I´m not very good), so for me Wii tennis is much cooler than real tennis, if I where really any good in tennis this would be different, but since I´m not Wii tennis is cooler for me, haven´t played real tennis for a year or so, and last time I checked I sucked and had very little fun :)

See I do belittle everything, even myself

My only problem with this is that it's too expensive. It's the same problem I consider the key issue for the PS3 itself.

I absolutely never argue that the PS3 isn't a solid piece of hardware. I have issues with its game library, yes; I don't think it's extremely innovative (although the Eye is), but the PS3 is well built and very versatile. 

But if there's anything a 600 dollar system DOES NOT need, it's a 100 dollar peripheral. This only reinforces the notion that this system is for technophiles.