I love myself too.

As for the other mods, let's see what their opinions hold.

this, http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=34180

Yep...turns out I didn't miss anything.  I was there, man.

I think I was just thrown off a little by some of the terms being used...namely "puppet" account.  All has been made clear.

The rules are pretty clear, just avoid insulting other people, or making comments just to bait people. If you have a problem with a particular situation, there's a staff link at the bottom with a bunch of people you can go talk to. Making threads in the forum really isn't the proper way to go about it.

I would rather have strict moderators than leanient ones IMO.

Although I generally believe that the less said about VGChartz mods, the better, I do feel obligated to say a few things about VGChartz mods's villainous, inerudite taradiddles. First off, there's a lot of daylight between VGChartz mods's views and mine. It believes that it is an organization of peace while I suspect that I welcome its comments. However, it needs to realize that it uses highfalutin terms like "pharmacodynamic" and "historiographical" to conceal its plans to make things worse. In this scheme of its, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that VGChartz mods is opposed to free enterprise, individual liberty, trial by jury, and even such post-Westphalian notions as national sovereignty. Now, that last statement is a bit of an oversimplification, an overgeneralization. But it is nevertheless substantially true.

I like to think I'm a reasonable person but you just can't reason with the most presumptuous smut peddlers I've ever seen. It's been tried. They don't understand, they can't understand, they don't want to understand, and they will die without understanding why all we want is for them not to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. I unmistakably can't stress this enough, but VGChartz mods's jeremiads can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that VGChartz mods's recommendations are a perfect example of overgeneralization and blatant fanaticism. I was right when I said that VGChartz mods is the type of organization that would shoot you just to see if its gun worked. And I was right when I said that this is not the first time I've wanted to take personal action and maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting VGChartz mods. But it is the first time I realized that not only does it impede the free flow of information, but it then commands its accomplices, "Go, and do thou likewise."

VGChartz mods prefers defamation to dialogue. I state these facts only to give a bit of personal background as to why if we look beyond VGChartz mods's delusions of grandeur, we see that it often argues that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known profiteer and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that this is a lesson for those with eyes to see. It is a lesson not so much about VGChartz mods's bitter behavior but about the way that you shouldn't let VGChartz mods intimidate you. You shouldn't let it push you around. We're the ones who are right, not VGChartz mods. VGChartz mods is like a broken record, using the same tired cliches about family and education and safer streets, yet there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I contend, there's a time to free VGChartz mods's mind from the constricting trammels of academicism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality. Or, to put it less poetically, VGChartz mods can't possibly believe that its decisions are based on reason. It's unregenerate but it's not that unregenerate. Finally, any one of the points I made in this letter could be turned into a complete research paper, but the conclusion of each would be the same: Insecure metagrobolism and headstrong absenteeism are a matched pair.

The moderators haven't been strict enough! Where is the enforcement of the forum rules?

If people would report more long sigs I would happily make people shorten long sigs. 

 good point

Maybe, but those that get banned just kept asking for it, then they come back for seconds. One question, When bans are giving out, are they approved by other higher-ups, or just BANNED?