I definitely prefer 60 over 30, but descent motion blur will make the difference almost unnoticeable.
| tallgnome said: 30fps is really all the human eye can handle so really as long as you don't get to a point on a game that is heavy intensive on the graphics then no worries on 30fps. 60fps on the otherhand is just nice to have. |
60 fps is what the eye can handle, not 30.
Anybody should clearly be able to tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps. Anything over 60 can't really be noticed though.
LEFT4DEAD411.COM
Bet with disolitude: Left4Dead will have a higher Metacritic rating than Project Origin, 3 months after the second game's release. (hasn't been 3 months but it looks like I won :-p )
30 is good enough, but I prefer 60 so that when inevitable frame-rate drops occur, I barely notice cause it's till going at like 36fps
Not trying to be a fanboy. Of course, it's hard when you own the best console eve... dang it
The human eye does not see a difference between 15 fps. You may think it looks better and smoother but you can't its more physcological
"Like you know"
It's always made a huge differance to me. And personally for people who can't ttell the differance I wonder if they are partially blind or something. To mee it's essential with bieng next gen. Thats one reason whi I hate on the PS3
"Let justice be done though the heavens fall." - Jim Garrison
"Ask not your horse, if ye should ride into battle" - myself
30 FPS = Nice
60 FPS = Nice-UR
It doesn't matter to me, I mean yeah I can see the difference.
60 FPS looks and plays better, but not by much.
It will not decide wither I get a game or not.
Its like buying a game for the Box Art.
I own all of lastgen systems as of October 2008. (Finally got a Dreamcast)
I own every currentgen system except PS3.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2026 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
