By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - 1UP: Top 5 Disappointing Videogame Sequels

Agree with the one that I've played, which is the lost levels (the description is right on)



Around the Network
Riachu said:
axumblade said:
I always heard that the SnakeEater was worse.

Actually, fans consider MGS3 as the better game, if I am correct?

 

 

 no most say the first is the best



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

ItsaMii said:
Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Chrono Cross deserves number 1.

You fail because Final Fantasy X-2 was way way more disappointing than Chrono Cross

 

 

FF X-2 had a good battle system. CC had a awfull plot, a crappy battle system and the worst battle music ever. FF X-2 didn`t kill every member of the original cast (they even ressurrected one). FF X-2 was the sequel to "just another FF game", CC was the sequel to the best RPG ever. FF X-2 plot is lame, like most of FF games. CC plot is retarded and offensive to CT fans.

So I say CC is worse and my opinion is worth more than yours.

I agree, FFX-2's plot was stupid but when you say most FF games having lame stories, I have to beg to differ. FFX had a great story. How is your opinion worth more than mine? You are being very arrogant for saying that and many people frown upon that since being arrogant is very rude. FFX-2 is considered to be a very bad game by fans for seveal obvious reasons.

 

How telling others they fail is not arrogant? And worse, telling me that my opinion fail. I only answer in such a manner when I see no room for rational discussion. Had you said "I disagree. FF- X2 was much more of a disappointment IMO. For example, I think that factors X, Y and Z are ..." I would not have any reason for harsh answers.

Well, that was not my fault.  If you haven't said that your opinion has more worth than mine, I wouldn't have insulted you.  I am just greatly annoyed when people look down at me.

 



brute said:
Riachu said:
axumblade said:
I always heard that the SnakeEater was worse.

Actually, fans consider MGS3 as the better game, if I am correct?

 

 

no most say the first is the best

No, I mean people generally think MGS3>MGS2

 



ItsaMii said:
Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Chrono Cross deserves number 1.

You fail because Final Fantasy X-2 was way way more disappointing than Chrono Cross

 

 

FF X-2 had a good battle system. CC had a awfull plot, a crappy battle system and the worst battle music ever. FF X-2 didn`t kill every member of the original cast (they even ressurrected one). FF X-2 was the sequel to "just another FF game", CC was the sequel to the best RPG ever. FF X-2 plot is lame, like most of FF games. CC plot is retarded and offensive to CT fans.

So I say CC is worse and my opinion is worth more than yours.

 

I'm going to have to agree with ItsaMii. If anything the speedy battle system was a saving grace for FFX-2. Though I think Chrono Cross not living up to Chrono Trigger is the reason it's knocked up several pegs on the disappointment scale. If it was released as a stand alone title then it might not be looked down on as much as it is.



CIHYFS?

Around the Network
Riachu said:
brute said:
Riachu said:
axumblade said:
I always heard that the SnakeEater was worse.

Actually, fans consider MGS3 as the better game, if I am correct?

 

 

no most say the first is the best

No, I mean people generally think MGS3>MGS2

 

yeah thats what most say

 



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

BCrayfish said:
ItsaMii said:
Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Chrono Cross deserves number 1.

You fail because Final Fantasy X-2 was way way more disappointing than Chrono Cross

 

 

FF X-2 had a good battle system. CC had a awfull plot, a crappy battle system and the worst battle music ever. FF X-2 didn`t kill every member of the original cast (they even ressurrected one). FF X-2 was the sequel to "just another FF game", CC was the sequel to the best RPG ever. FF X-2 plot is lame, like most of FF games. CC plot is retarded and offensive to CT fans.

So I say CC is worse and my opinion is worth more than yours.

 

I'm going to have to agree with ItsaMii. If anything the speedy battle system was a saving grace for FFX-2. Though I think Chrono Cross not living up to Chrono Trigger is the reason it's knocked up several pegs on the disappointment scale. If it was released as a stand alone title then it might not be looked down on as much as it is.

That is the problem.  People should think of CC as more of a side story than a sequel. Especially since Kato said that CC was more of a sidestory to CT than a sequel.  The only reason CC was billed as a sequel was so it would sell well.

 



Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Chrono Cross deserves number 1.

You fail because Final Fantasy X-2 was way way more disappointing than Chrono Cross

 

 

yep, totally agree with this. FFX-2 had only an interesting battle system, nothing more. Chrono Cross is much better than FFX-2 and a much less dissapointing sequel.



slimeattack said:
Come on, MGS2 was awesome.

 

 yeah it was



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

memory2zack said:
Riachu said:
ItsaMii said:
Chrono Cross deserves number 1.

You fail because Final Fantasy X-2 was way way more disappointing than Chrono Cross

 

 

yep, totally agree with this. FFX-2 had only an interesting battle system, nothing more. Chrono Cross is much better than FFX-2 and a much less dissapointing sequel.

The battle system was decent but the story was lame and also, because all of the mini game induced sidequests, convoluted.  The girly atmoshpere didn't help either