Chatting abouthis earlier, it's quite interesting.

Are you for or against.

Or are you like me where you believe some (responsible) countries should have bombs but others (triggerhappy countries) shouldn't.

Obviously against. It's too easy to wipe out entire nations.

against.

How could you be for nuclear weapons?

against, unless you holding the world at ransom for alot of money

Some people must be for nuclear weapons otherwise they wouldn't exist.

i personally think that only the most responsible countries should get to build them if they wish. even so it should be given a lot of thought.

If I am living in the "user" country, for.
If I am living in the "usee" country, against.

Of course, morally I am against. But in the real world reason suggests that Nukes both deter and are capable of destroying enemies if needed.

If the world were run on morals crazy things would be happening.

Spoiled alcoholic oil-tychoon children would be elected president
The government would be able to get away with lying to it's people to start a war for profit.
Medical care would be too expensive for sick children on the basis of "I earned it I keep it".
Banks would be collapse because of bad lending.
Democracies would start wars.

Actually those things aren't moral or rational.

For

Not on my Dead Body, even when accidently misused they can pose HUGE Danger.

I'm for my country having them... and agaisnt every other country in the world having them.

In fact... having nuclear weapons should be based completely on my residence as the nuclear weapons would go with me to whatever country i currently live in.

Then countries would offer me all sorts of free money and stuff.  However i could also mentally detonate the missles, or they'd go off if i didn't relay a code to them every so often... that way people don't try to drug or imprison me.