| Chubear said: No dude, not brave at all. Brave would mean me sticking my neck on the line in belief that it won't be hacked off. I'm afraid I'm not so brave at all. My statements don't come from some act of bravado but just a pattern I see plain as day that others, oddly enough, don't see. See, there are people that make a good living from watching patterns develop in varied industrial fields. These guys (if they're good) can see + or - patterns and inform their clients on their findings. Some are very good at it and see these patterns plain as day, others are OK at it but most people really suck at it thus the need for financial industry analysts. I wish I could lead you to believe I have gonads of a Bull but in actuality it's just that I see clear as day. Unles something catastrophic happens in the industry, Sony's console will be on top for this gen yet again. The only difference I see is the Nintendo beating out MCs console this time round. |
First off, that is how your post is supposed to look ...
iF i StArTeD tO wRiTe LiKe ThIs It wOuLd gEt AnNoYiNg QuIcKlY ... so pleas don't write all in bold
Now, unless you can explain how a company can produce the most popular console in a generation without third party support I don't see how Sony can match previous success. As I have said before when you discount launch hype and the holiday season the PS3 has sold about 1 Million units, if they're lucky they will have sold 6 Million units world wide by the end of 2007; and with a price cut Sony may get to 14 Million by the end of 2008. If you look how low these numbers really are third party developers will have a difficult time justifying why they would spend 2 to 4 times as much to develop a game for the PS3 and XBox 360 when the Wii outsells them both combined.











